SWLGX vs. SWSSX
SWLGX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund) and SWSSX (Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares) are both mutual funds - SWLGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index, while SWSSX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SWLGX returned 11.85%/yr vs 7.16%/yr for SWSSX. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SWLGX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SWSSX.
Performance
SWLGX vs. SWSSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWLGX achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than SWSSX's 18.88% return.
SWLGX
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 10.12%
- 3Y*
- 19.35%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.66%
SWSSX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -2.11%
- 6M
- 11.73%
- YTD
- 18.88%
- 1Y
- 37.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.33%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- 10.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.55%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
SWLGX vs. SWSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.29% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
SWSSX Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares | 18.88% | 12.88% | 11.57% | 17.07% | -20.43% | 14.77% | 20.12% | 25.63% | -11.19% | -0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWLGX and SWSSX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017 | 0.72 |
The correlation between SWLGX and SWSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
SWLGX vs. SWSSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SWLGX
SWSSX
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
SWLGX
SWSSX
Communication Services
SWLGX
SWSSX
Industrials
SWLGX
SWSSX
Consumer Cyclical
SWLGX
SWSSX
Healthcare
SWLGX
SWSSX
Financial Services
SWLGX
SWSSX
Consumer Defensive
SWLGX
SWSSX
Energy
SWLGX
SWSSX
Real Estate
SWLGX
SWSSX
Utilities
SWLGX
SWSSX
Basic Materials
SWLGX
SWSSX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWLGX vs. SWSSX — Risk / Return Rank
SWLGX
SWSSX
SWLGX vs. SWSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWLGX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.30 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 3.13 | -2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.49 | 11.09 | -9.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWLGX vs. SWSSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWLGX drawdown since its inception was -32.69%, smaller than the maximum SWSSX drawdown of -60.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWLGX and SWSSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWLGX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.69% | -60.34% | +27.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.16% | -11.00% | -5.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.30% | -27.50% | +4.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.69% | -31.93% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.01% | -3.01% | -5.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -10.67% | +3.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.39% | 3.10% | +2.29% |
Volatility
SWLGX vs. SWSSX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) at 3.83%. This indicates that SWLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWLGX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 3.83% | +2.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.03% | 14.15% | -0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.51% | 19.42% | -1.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.80% | 22.55% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.68% | 24.07% | -1.39% |
SWLGX vs. SWSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWLGX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SWSSX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SWLGX vs. SWSSX - Dividend Comparison
SWLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than SWSSX's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.46% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWSSX Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares | 1.08% | 1.29% | 1.66% | 1.49% | 1.32% | 8.88% | 2.55% | 6.12% | 10.45% | 5.22% | 4.10% | 6.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SWLGX and SWSSX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWLGX has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to SWSSX (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWLGX dropped -32.69% vs SWSSX's -60.34%.
SWSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWLGX and SWSSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer