PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWLGX vs. FDTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWLGX vs. FDTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWLGX achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than FDTRX's 13.66% return.


SWLGX

1D
-0.37%
1M
7.15%
YTD
8.61%
6M
8.00%
1Y
27.46%
3Y*
25.54%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*

FDTRX

1D
0.42%
1M
7.29%
YTD
13.66%
6M
12.67%
1Y
31.16%
3Y*
26.26%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
18.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWLGX vs. FDTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
8.61%18.55%33.30%42.67%-29.17%27.55%38.43%36.30%-1.59%-0.60%
FDTRX
Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6
13.66%18.97%31.01%44.92%-40.07%12.90%58.22%36.84%3.22%-0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SWLGX and FDTRX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017

0.94

The correlation between SWLGX and FDTRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWLGX vs. FDTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWLGX
SWLGX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SWLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

FDTRX
FDTRX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FDTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWLGX vs. FDTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWLGXFDTRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

1.57

+0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.50

2.09

+0.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.27

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

1.57

+0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.92

4.89

+1.03

SWLGX vs. FDTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWLGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the FDTRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWLGX and FDTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWLGXFDTRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.57

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.45

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.75

+0.05

Drawdowns

SWLGX vs. FDTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWLGX drawdown since its inception was -32.69%, smaller than the maximum FDTRX drawdown of -48.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWLGX and FDTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWLGXFDTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.69%

-48.10%

+15.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.16%

-20.39%

+4.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.30%

-26.19%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.69%

-48.10%

+15.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

0.00%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.05%

-9.15%

+2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.80%

6.52%

-1.72%

Volatility

SWLGX vs. FDTRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) is 3.30%, while Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that SWLGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWLGXFDTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

4.76%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

15.85%

-4.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.40%

20.38%

-4.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.49%

26.21%

-4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.68%

24.61%

-1.93%

SWLGX vs. FDTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWLGX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FDTRX's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWLGX vs. FDTRX - Dividend Comparison

SWLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than FDTRX's 9.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDTRX
Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6
9.14%10.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.36%0.00%0.71%2.80%1.71%3.44%2.40%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
0.42%0.46%0.52%0.67%0.93%1.76%0.67%0.96%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SWLGX and FDTRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDTRX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to SWLGX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWLGX dropped -32.69% vs FDTRX's -48.10%.

SWLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWLGX and FDTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer