PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWK vs. NFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SWK vs. NFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) and National Fuel Gas Company (NFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWK achieves a 30.12% return, which is significantly higher than NFG's 4.13% return. Over the past 10 years, SWK has underperformed NFG with an annualized return of 0.18%, while NFG has yielded a comparatively higher 7.52% annualized return.


SWK

1D
-1.02%
1M
3.55%
6M
22.87%
YTD
30.12%
1Y
46.18%
3Y*
0.86%
5Y*
-10.50%
10Y*
0.18%
ALL TIME*
8.54%

NFG

1D
-0.19%
1M
6.21%
6M
-0.46%
YTD
4.13%
1Y
-2.75%
3Y*
19.99%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
7.52%
ALL TIME*
9.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$58.89M$56.86M$61.39M
$217.53M$159.95M$146.32M

SWK vs. NFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
30.12%-3.17%-15.19%35.55%-58.92%7.28%9.73%41.18%-28.13%50.50%
NFG
National Fuel Gas Company
4.13%35.31%25.38%-17.71%1.87%60.66%-7.58%-5.94%-3.74%-0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SWK and NFG is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 1987

0.28

The correlation between SWK and NFG shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.30 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SWK:

$14.28B

NFG:

$7.82B

EPS

SWK:

$5.44

NFG:

$7.24

PE Ratio

SWK:

17.39

NFG:

11.38

PS Ratio

SWK:

0.71

NFG:

3.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

SWK:

$15.25B

NFG:

$2.50B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SWK:

$4.84B

NFG:

$1.23B

EBITDA (TTM)

SWK:

$1.33B

NFG:

$1.52B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWK vs. NFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SWK
SWK Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SWK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWK Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SWK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWK Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

NFG
NFG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
NFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFG Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
NFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFG Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SWK vs. NFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) and National Fuel Gas Company (NFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWKNFGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.99

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

-0.13

+1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.95

-0.24

+4.19

SWK vs. NFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWK Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the NFG Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWK and NFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWK vs. NFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWK drawdown since its inception was -71.31%, which is greater than NFG's maximum drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWK and NFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWKNFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.31%

-55.49%

-15.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.14%

-20.93%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.31%

-20.93%

-27.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.79%

-35.74%

-33.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.31%

-44.28%

-27.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.55%

-13.63%

-34.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-14.35%

-5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.73%

11.43%

+0.30%

Volatility

SWK vs. NFG - Volatility Comparison

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) has a higher volatility of 10.42% compared to National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) at 6.54%. This indicates that SWK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWKNFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.42%

6.54%

+3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.86%

14.53%

+14.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.42%

19.62%

+18.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.16%

22.24%

+15.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.85%

24.05%

+12.80%

Dividends

SWK vs. NFG - Dividend Comparison

SWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than NFG's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NFG
National Fuel Gas Company
2.62%2.65%3.36%3.91%2.97%2.83%4.30%3.72%3.30%3.00%2.84%3.67%
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
3.51%4.44%4.06%3.28%4.23%1.58%1.56%1.63%2.15%1.43%1.97%2.01%

Financials

SWK vs. NFG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and National Fuel Gas Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

SWK vs. NFG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and National Fuel Gas Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

SWK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.31B and revenue of 3.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.0%.

NFG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported a gross profit of 231.42M and revenue of 537.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.1%.

SWK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported an operating income of 361.70M and revenue of 3.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

NFG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported an operating income of 208.94M and revenue of 537.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 38.9%.

SWK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported a net income of 351.30M and revenue of 3.96B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.

NFG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported a net income of 138.62M and revenue of 537.50M, resulting in a net margin of 25.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SWK and NFG have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWK has higher volatility (10.42%) compared to NFG (6.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWK dropped -71.31% vs NFG's -55.49%.

SWK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWK and NFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer