SWHRX vs. SCYB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SWHRX (Schwab Target 2025 Fund) and SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) are both funds - SWHRX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Charles Schwab, while SCYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. Over the past year, SWHRX returned 14.24% vs 6.99% for SCYB. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SWHRX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCYB.

Performance

SWHRX vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2025 Fund (SWHRX) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWHRX achieves a 5.19% return, which is significantly higher than SCYB's 1.55% return.

SWHRX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 2.33%
• YTD: 5.19%
• 6M: 5.43%
• 1Y: 14.24%
• 3Y*: 11.38%
• 5Y*: 5.29%
• 10Y*: 7.46%

SCYB

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.87%
• 1Y: 6.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWHRX vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SWHRX Schwab Target 2025 Fund	5.19%	12.70%	8.78%	6.23%
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF	1.55%	8.33%	8.15%	6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SWHRX and SCYB is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023	0.78

The correlation between SWHRX and SCYB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWHRX vs. SCYB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SWHRX	SCYB
Technology	26.2%	4.5%
Financial Services	11.8%	4.9%
Industrials	11.5%	8.7%
Healthcare	10.5%	5.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	10.6%
Communication Services	8.9%	8.9%
Real Estate	7.7%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	2.5%
Energy	4.3%	5.8%
Basic Materials	3.3%	3.5%
Utilities	2.0%	2.0%

Return for Risk

SWHRX vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWHRX

SWHRX Risk / Return Rank: 61
SWHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SWHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SWHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SWHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
SWHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

SCYB

SCYB Risk / Return Rank: 59
SCYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SCYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SCYB Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SCYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SCYB Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWHRX vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2025 Fund (SWHRX) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SWHRX	SCYB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	1.88	+0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	2.81	+0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.37	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	2.87	-0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.29	12.87	-0.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SWHRX vs. SCYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWHRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the SCYB Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWHRX and SCYB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SWHRX	SCYB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	1.88	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	1.68	-1.12

Drawdowns

SWHRX vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWHRX drawdown since its inception was -37.97%, which is greater than SCYB's maximum drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWHRX and SCYB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWHRX	SCYB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.97%	-4.92%	-33.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.18%	-2.44%	-2.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.33%	+0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.34%	-0.52%	-4.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.17%	0.54%	+0.63%

Volatility

SWHRX vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2025 Fund (SWHRX) has a higher volatility of 2.04% compared to Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) at 1.07%. This indicates that SWHRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWHRX	SCYB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.04%	1.07%	+0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.98%	2.93%	+2.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.20%	3.76%	+2.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.92%	5.13%	+5.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.50%	5.13%	+5.37%

SWHRX vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWHRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SWHRX vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison

SWHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.63%, more than SCYB's 6.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF	6.94%	6.99%	7.06%	3.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SWHRX Schwab Target 2025 Fund	9.63%	10.13%	7.82%	5.19%	5.72%	6.41%	2.94%	5.47%	5.95%	3.78%	5.31%	7.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWHRX and SCYB in my portfolio?

SWHRX and SCYB have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SWHRX or SCYB?

SWHRX has higher volatility (2.04%) compared to SCYB (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWHRX dropped -37.97% vs SCYB's -4.92%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SWHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.