PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWHGX vs. SWAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWHGX vs. SWAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ (SWHGX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWHGX achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly higher than SWAGX's -0.84% return.


SWHGX

1D
0.89%
1M
1.06%
6M
7.38%
YTD
10.48%
1Y
19.31%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
10.07%
ALL TIME*
7.63%

SWAGX

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.35%
6M
-0.96%
YTD
-0.84%
1Y
1.54%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
-0.70%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SWHGX vs. SWAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWHGX
Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™
10.48%17.49%11.76%18.22%-15.06%18.09%11.02%22.23%-7.19%11.50%
SWAGX
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund
-0.84%7.11%1.38%5.46%-13.62%-2.29%7.39%8.64%-0.11%2.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SWHGX and SWAGX is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2017

0.09

Over the past year, SWHGX and SWAGX have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWHGX vs. SWAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SWHGX
SWHGX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SWHGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWHGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWHGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SWHGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWHGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SWAGX
SWAGX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SWAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SWAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SWHGX vs. SWAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ (SWHGX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWHGXSWAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.07

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

0.54

+2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.97

1.33

+10.64

SWHGX vs. SWAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWHGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the SWAGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWHGX and SWAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWHGX vs. SWAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWHGX drawdown since its inception was -49.19%, which is greater than SWAGX's maximum drawdown of -19.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWHGX and SWAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWHGXSWAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.19%

-19.68%

-29.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.38%

-3.05%

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-5.01%

-8.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.63%

-18.59%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.57%

+4.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-5.65%

-1.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

1.25%

+0.48%

Volatility

SWHGX vs. SWAGX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ (SWHGX) has a higher volatility of 2.89% compared to Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX) at 1.02%. This indicates that SWHGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWHGXSWAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

1.02%

+1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.43%

3.04%

+5.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

3.81%

+6.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.61%

6.09%

+7.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.21%

5.09%

+9.12%

SWHGX vs. SWAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWHGX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SWAGX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWHGX vs. SWAGX - Dividend Comparison

SWHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.68%, more than SWAGX's 3.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWAGX
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund
3.88%4.02%3.88%3.22%1.93%1.56%2.47%2.87%2.80%1.98%0.00%0.00%
SWHGX
Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™
8.68%9.59%11.68%4.00%4.53%5.04%8.15%5.76%5.76%4.87%3.73%14.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWHGX and SWAGX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWHGX has higher volatility (2.89%) compared to SWAGX (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWHGX dropped -49.19% vs SWAGX's -19.68%.

SWHGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWHGX and SWAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer