PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWHGX vs. SIFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWHGX vs. SIFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ (SWHGX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWHGX achieves a 10.29% return, which is significantly higher than SIFAX's 8.08% return. Over the past 10 years, SWHGX has outperformed SIFAX with an annualized return of 10.43%, while SIFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.55% annualized return.


SWHGX

1D
0.27%
1M
3.95%
YTD
10.29%
6M
10.70%
1Y
24.00%
3Y*
16.82%
5Y*
8.99%
10Y*
10.43%

SIFAX

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.50%
YTD
8.08%
6M
7.70%
1Y
12.43%
3Y*
7.51%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
3.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWHGX vs. SIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWHGX
Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™
10.29%17.49%11.76%18.22%-15.06%18.09%11.02%22.23%-7.19%16.11%
SIFAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund
8.08%7.82%4.08%-1.74%8.48%10.83%-1.59%5.68%-3.64%-1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between SWHGX and SIFAX is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.30

The correlation between SWHGX and SIFAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWHGX vs. SIFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWHGX
SWHGX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SWHGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWHGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWHGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SWHGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWHGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SIFAX
SIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWHGX vs. SIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ (SWHGX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWHGXSIFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.44

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

5.18

-1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.47

16.54

-2.07

SWHGX vs. SIFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWHGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the SIFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWHGX and SIFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWHGXSIFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.31

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

1.05

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.68

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.34

+0.18

Drawdowns

SWHGX vs. SIFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWHGX drawdown since its inception was -49.19%, which is greater than SIFAX's maximum drawdown of -23.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWHGX and SIFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWHGXSIFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.19%

-23.62%

-25.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.38%

-2.41%

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-3.57%

-9.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.63%

-8.32%

-17.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.77%

-14.69%

-15.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.83%

+1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-8.55%

+1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

0.75%

+0.93%

Volatility

SWHGX vs. SIFAX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™ (SWHGX) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) at 2.18%. This indicates that SWHGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWHGXSIFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

2.18%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

4.69%

+2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.78%

5.41%

+4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.55%

5.60%

+7.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.25%

5.22%

+9.03%

SWHGX vs. SIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWHGX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SIFAX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWHGX vs. SIFAX - Dividend Comparison

SWHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.69%, more than SIFAX's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIFAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund
4.21%4.55%3.25%3.82%11.90%7.89%1.45%1.49%1.90%1.39%1.15%0.48%
SWHGX
Schwab MarketTrack Growth Portfolio™
8.69%9.59%11.68%4.00%4.53%5.04%8.15%5.76%5.76%4.87%3.73%14.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWHGX and SIFAX have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWHGX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to SIFAX (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWHGX dropped -49.19% vs SIFAX's -23.62%.

SWHGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWHGX and SIFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer