PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWHFX vs. SHSSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWHFX vs. SHSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) and Health Sciences Opportunities Fund Class Institutional (SHSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWHFX achieves a -4.43% return, which is significantly lower than SHSSX's -3.76% return. Over the past 10 years, SWHFX has underperformed SHSSX with an annualized return of 7.11%, while SHSSX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.56% annualized return.


SWHFX

1D
-1.53%
1M
0.95%
YTD
-4.43%
6M
-9.17%
1Y
5.68%
3Y*
3.46%
5Y*
3.27%
10Y*
7.11%

SHSSX

1D
-1.30%
1M
1.93%
YTD
-3.76%
6M
-3.73%
1Y
15.12%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
4.40%
10Y*
9.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWHFX vs. SHSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWHFX
Schwab Health Care Fund™
-4.43%9.81%0.10%0.73%-4.66%23.36%12.83%17.64%3.68%20.31%
SHSSX
Health Sciences Opportunities Fund Class Institutional
-3.76%16.13%4.00%3.86%-5.72%12.17%19.54%25.63%8.24%25.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SWHFX and SHSSX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.92

The correlation between SWHFX and SHSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWHFX vs. SHSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWHFX
SWHFX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
SWHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
SWHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SHSSX
SHSSX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SHSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
SHSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWHFX vs. SHSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) and Health Sciences Opportunities Fund Class Institutional (SHSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWHFXSHSSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.39

1.14

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.64

1.74

-1.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.20

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

1.59

-1.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.28

4.03

-2.75

SWHFX vs. SHSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWHFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the SHSSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWHFX and SHSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWHFXSHSSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

1.14

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.31

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.58

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.69

-0.20

Drawdowns

SWHFX vs. SHSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWHFX drawdown since its inception was -43.10%, which is greater than SHSSX's maximum drawdown of -35.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWHFX and SHSSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWHFXSHSSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.10%

-35.40%

-7.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.74%

-9.83%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-15.95%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.35%

-17.90%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.28%

-28.34%

+1.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.38%

-6.54%

-4.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.16%

-5.98%

-2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.95%

3.88%

+2.07%

Volatility

SWHFX vs. SHSSX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) and Health Sciences Opportunities Fund Class Institutional (SHSSX) have volatilities of 3.81% and 3.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWHFXSHSSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

3.82%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.09%

10.28%

+1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.76%

13.68%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.64%

14.35%

+0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.96%

16.53%

-0.57%

SWHFX vs. SHSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWHFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than SHSSX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWHFX vs. SHSSX - Dividend Comparison

SWHFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.29%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHSSX
Health Sciences Opportunities Fund Class Institutional
10.29%9.90%8.68%3.82%7.20%8.96%4.18%3.87%8.44%3.59%2.33%12.29%
SWHFX
Schwab Health Care Fund™
0.00%0.00%9.49%3.60%4.18%12.52%11.47%4.56%10.02%7.32%2.63%16.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SWHFX and SHSSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SHSSX has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to SWHFX (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWHFX dropped -43.10% vs SHSSX's -35.40%.

SHSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWHFX and SHSSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer