SWHFX vs. GGHCX
SWHFX (Schwab Health Care Fund™) and GGHCX (Invesco Health Care Fund) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SWHFX returned 7.70%/yr vs 7.06%/yr for GGHCX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SWHFX charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for GGHCX.
Performance
SWHFX vs. GGHCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWHFX achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly higher than GGHCX's 3.51% return. Over the past 10 years, SWHFX has outperformed GGHCX with an annualized return of 7.70%, while GGHCX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.06% annualized return.
SWHFX
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- 6M
- 3.12%
- YTD
- 5.02%
- 1Y
- 17.24%
- 3Y*
- 5.89%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- 7.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.71%
GGHCX
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- 6M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 1Y
- 18.53%
- 3Y*
- 8.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.71%
- 10Y*
- 7.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
SWHFX vs. GGHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWHFX Schwab Health Care Fund™ | 5.02% | 9.81% | 0.10% | 0.73% | -4.66% | 23.36% | 12.83% | 17.64% | 3.68% | 20.31% |
GGHCX Invesco Health Care Fund | 3.51% | 15.48% | 3.96% | 3.05% | -13.53% | 12.05% | 14.52% | 32.01% | 0.27% | 15.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWHFX and GGHCX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001 | 0.89 |
The correlation between SWHFX and GGHCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWHFX vs. GGHCX — Risk / Return Rank
SWHFX
GGHCX
SWHFX vs. GGHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) and Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWHFX | GGHCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.21 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 1.31 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.32 | 2.86 | -0.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWHFX vs. GGHCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWHFX drawdown since its inception was -43.10%, which is greater than GGHCX's maximum drawdown of -40.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWHFX and GGHCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWHFX | GGHCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.10% | -40.23% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.74% | -13.53% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.35% | -16.86% | -2.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.35% | -25.37% | +6.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.28% | -29.34% | +2.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.62% | -2.93% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.15% | -8.80% | +0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.45% | 6.15% | +0.30% |
Volatility
SWHFX vs. GGHCX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX) at 5.14%. This indicates that SWHFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGHCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWHFX | GGHCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.79% | 5.14% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.88% | 11.43% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.74% | 14.28% | +2.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 15.71% | -0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 17.44% | -1.39% |
SWHFX vs. GGHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWHFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than GGHCX's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWHFX vs. GGHCX - Dividend Comparison
SWHFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGHCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGHCX Invesco Health Care Fund | 5.49% | 5.69% | 5.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 24.69% | 6.44% | 3.51% | 8.81% | 6.88% | 2.24% | 15.07% |
SWHFX Schwab Health Care Fund™ | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.49% | 3.60% | 4.18% | 12.52% | 11.47% | 4.56% | 10.02% | 7.32% | 2.63% | 16.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, SWHFX and GGHCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SWHFX has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to GGHCX (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWHFX dropped -43.10% vs GGHCX's -40.23%.
GGHCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWHFX and GGHCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer