SWGRX vs. SNXFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Target 2015 Fund (SWGRX) and Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX).
SWGRX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Mar 11, 2008. SNXFX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Schwab 1000 Index. It was launched on Apr 2, 1991.
Performance
SWGRX vs. SNXFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWGRX vs. SNXFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWGRX Schwab Target 2015 Fund | -2.00% | 11.78% | 7.90% | 12.46% | -14.56% | 7.50% | 11.47% | 15.05% | -3.79% | 10.76% |
SNXFX Schwab 1000 Index Fund | -6.94% | 17.23% | 24.46% | 26.53% | -19.46% | 26.10% | 20.71% | 31.43% | -5.04% | 21.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWGRX achieves a -2.00% return, which is significantly higher than SNXFX's -6.94% return. Over the past 10 years, SWGRX has underperformed SNXFX with an annualized return of 5.57%, while SNXFX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.39% annualized return.
SWGRX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- YTD
- -2.00%
- 6M
- -0.42%
- 1Y
- 8.53%
- 3Y*
- 8.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.94%
- 10Y*
- 5.57%
SNXFX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -7.77%
- YTD
- -6.94%
- 6M
- -4.75%
- 1Y
- 14.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWGRX vs. SNXFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWGRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SNXFX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SWGRX vs. SNXFX — Risk / Return Rank
SWGRX
SNXFX
SWGRX vs. SNXFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2015 Fund (SWGRX) and Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWGRX | SNXFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.22 | 0.82 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 1.27 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.19 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.02 | +0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.99 | 4.97 | +2.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWGRX | SNXFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 0.82 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.61 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.72 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.55 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWGRX and SNXFX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWGRX vs. SNXFX - Dividend Comparison
SWGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%, more than SNXFX's 1.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWGRX Schwab Target 2015 Fund | 9.05% | 8.87% | 8.02% | 6.06% | 6.48% | 6.90% | 4.41% | 5.44% | 5.15% | 5.67% | 5.27% | 7.08% |
SNXFX Schwab 1000 Index Fund | 1.56% | 1.45% | 1.23% | 1.41% | 1.61% | 1.74% | 2.76% | 3.01% | 6.49% | 4.23% | 3.41% | 6.31% |
Drawdowns
SWGRX vs. SNXFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWGRX drawdown since its inception was -34.83%, smaller than the maximum SNXFX drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWGRX and SNXFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWGRX | SNXFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.83% | -55.08% | +20.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.07% | -12.33% | +7.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.46% | -25.36% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.46% | -34.58% | +10.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.53% | -8.94% | +4.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -8.80% | +3.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | 2.54% | -1.35% |
Volatility
SWGRX vs. SNXFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Target 2015 Fund (SWGRX) is 2.53%, while Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that SWGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNXFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWGRX | SNXFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.53% | 4.35% | -1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.16% | 9.32% | -5.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.12% | 18.40% | -11.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.34% | 17.28% | -6.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.76% | 18.69% | -9.93% |