PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWGRX vs. FOTKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWGRX vs. FOTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2015 Fund (SWGRX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWGRX achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly lower than FOTKX's 5.43% return.


SWGRX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.59%
YTD
4.46%
6M
4.90%
1Y
12.97%
3Y*
10.24%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
6.11%

FOTKX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.88%
YTD
5.43%
6M
5.81%
1Y
12.95%
3Y*
9.32%
5Y*
3.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWGRX vs. FOTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWGRX
Schwab Target 2015 Fund
4.46%11.78%7.90%12.46%-14.56%7.50%11.47%15.05%-3.79%4.77%
FOTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6
5.43%11.66%5.55%9.97%-13.05%5.68%11.29%14.46%-3.65%5.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SWGRX and FOTKX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.93

The correlation between SWGRX and FOTKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWGRX vs. FOTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWGRX
SWGRX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SWGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SWGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FOTKX
FOTKX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FOTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FOTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWGRX vs. FOTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2015 Fund (SWGRX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWGRXFOTKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.31

2.67

-0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.36

3.90

-0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.55

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

3.26

-0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.55

14.38

-1.84

SWGRX vs. FOTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the FOTKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWGRX and FOTKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWGRXFOTKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.67

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.61

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.87

-0.31

Drawdowns

SWGRX vs. FOTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWGRX drawdown since its inception was -34.83%, which is greater than FOTKX's maximum drawdown of -18.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWGRX and FOTKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWGRXFOTKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.83%

-18.29%

-16.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.70%

-4.03%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.12%

-5.71%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.46%

-18.29%

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-3.56%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

0.91%

+0.15%

Volatility

SWGRX vs. FOTKX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2015 Fund (SWGRX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX) have volatilities of 1.91% and 1.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWGRXFOTKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.91%

1.94%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.56%

4.14%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.69%

4.92%

+0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.38%

6.38%

+4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.80%

6.42%

+2.38%

SWGRX vs. FOTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWGRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FOTKX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWGRX vs. FOTKX - Dividend Comparison

SWGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.49%, more than FOTKX's 4.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6
4.91%5.25%3.32%2.98%7.41%9.53%6.17%6.00%7.24%3.57%0.00%0.00%
SWGRX
Schwab Target 2015 Fund
8.49%8.87%8.02%6.06%6.48%6.90%4.41%5.44%5.15%5.67%5.27%7.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SWGRX and FOTKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FOTKX has higher volatility (1.94%) compared to SWGRX (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWGRX dropped -34.83% vs FOTKX's -18.29%.

FOTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWGRX and FOTKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer