PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWERX vs. SFLNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWERX vs. SFLNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2040 Fund (SWERX) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWERX achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly lower than SFLNX's 14.44% return. Over the past 10 years, SWERX has underperformed SFLNX with an annualized return of 10.12%, while SFLNX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.24% annualized return.


SWERX

1D
-0.60%
1M
2.49%
YTD
8.62%
6M
9.08%
1Y
21.43%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
7.92%
10Y*
10.12%

SFLNX

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.77%
YTD
14.44%
6M
14.69%
1Y
32.68%
3Y*
20.85%
5Y*
12.81%
10Y*
14.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWERX vs. SFLNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWERX
Schwab Target 2040 Fund
8.62%17.71%12.74%19.06%-18.57%15.65%14.44%23.01%-9.11%20.48%
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
14.44%17.02%16.78%18.16%-6.89%31.64%9.12%28.91%-7.43%17.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SWERX and SFLNX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.92

The correlation between SWERX and SFLNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWERX vs. SFLNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWERX
SWERX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SWERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWERX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SWERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWERX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SFLNX
SFLNX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SFLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWERX vs. SFLNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2040 Fund (SWERX) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWERXSFLNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.57

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

5.30

-2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.97

20.80

-8.83

SWERX vs. SFLNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWERX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is lower than the SFLNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWERX and SFLNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWERXSFLNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

3.13

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.84

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.78

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.53

0.00

Drawdowns

SWERX vs. SFLNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWERX drawdown since its inception was -48.24%, smaller than the maximum SFLNX drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWERX and SFLNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWERXSFLNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.24%

-56.18%

+7.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.08%

-6.10%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.05%

-16.27%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.40%

-18.98%

-11.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.40%

-37.59%

+7.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-0.19%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-6.01%

-1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.55%

+0.27%

Volatility

SWERX vs. SFLNX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2040 Fund (SWERX) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) at 2.36%. This indicates that SWERX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFLNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWERXSFLNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

2.36%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

7.41%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.02%

10.36%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.99%

15.26%

-0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.84%

18.40%

-3.56%

SWERX vs. SFLNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWERX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLNX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWERX vs. SFLNX - Dividend Comparison

SWERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.62%, more than SFLNX's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
1.46%1.68%1.78%1.86%2.09%4.78%6.17%5.33%9.69%3.28%7.23%5.68%
SWERX
Schwab Target 2040 Fund
6.62%7.19%5.00%3.83%8.31%6.96%3.33%7.69%8.57%4.13%6.76%10.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWERX and SFLNX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWERX has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to SFLNX (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWERX dropped -48.24% vs SFLNX's -56.18%.

SFLNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWERX and SFLNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer