SWERX vs. SFLNX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SWERX (Schwab Target 2040 Fund) and SFLNX (Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund) are both mutual funds - SWERX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Charles Schwab, while SFLNX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell RAFI US Large Company Index. Over the past 10 years, SWERX returned 9.83%/yr vs 14.26%/yr for SFLNX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SWERX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SFLNX.

Performance

SWERX vs. SFLNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2040 Fund (SWERX) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWERX achieves a 8.16% return, which is significantly lower than SFLNX's 17.46% return. Over the past 10 years, SWERX has underperformed SFLNX with an annualized return of 9.83%, while SFLNX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.26% annualized return.

SWERX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -0.23%
• 6M: 5.07%
• YTD: 8.16%
• 1Y: 17.99%
• 3Y*: 14.31%
• 5Y*: 7.51%
• 10Y*: 9.83%
• ALL TIME*: 8.28%

SFLNX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 1.35%
• 6M: 11.71%
• YTD: 17.46%
• 1Y: 32.23%
• 3Y*: 18.96%
• 5Y*: 13.78%
• 10Y*: 14.26%
• ALL TIME*: 11.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SFLNX Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SWERX Schwab Target 2040 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SWERX vs. SFLNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SWERX Schwab Target 2040 Fund	8.16%	17.71%	12.74%	19.06%	-18.57%	15.65%	14.44%	23.01%	-9.11%	20.48%
SFLNX Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund	17.46%	17.02%	16.78%	18.16%	-6.89%	31.64%	9.12%	28.91%	-7.43%	17.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SWERX and SFLNX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008	0.92

The correlation between SWERX and SFLNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SWERX vs. SFLNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SWERX

SWERX Risk / Return Rank: 60
SWERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SWERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
SWERX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SWERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SWERX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

SFLNX

SFLNX Risk / Return Rank: 96
SFLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SFLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
SFLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
SFLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SFLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SWERX vs. SFLNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2040 Fund (SWERX) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SWERX	SFLNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	2.93	-1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	4.04	-1.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.54	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	5.01	-2.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.05	20.10	-11.05

SWERX vs. SFLNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWERX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the SFLNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWERX and SFLNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SWERX vs. SFLNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWERX drawdown since its inception was -48.24%, smaller than the maximum SFLNX drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWERX and SFLNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWERX	SFLNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.24%	-56.18%	+7.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.08%	-6.10%	-1.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.05%	-16.27%	+3.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.40%	-18.98%	-11.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.40%	-37.59%	+7.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	-0.42%	-0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.10%	-5.96%	-1.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	1.52%	+0.37%

Volatility

SWERX vs. SFLNX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2040 Fund (SWERX) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) at 2.33%. This indicates that SWERX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFLNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWERX	SFLNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.94%	2.33%	+0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.93%	7.48%	+1.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.85%	10.48%	+0.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.08%	15.15%	-0.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.79%	18.34%	-3.55%

SWERX vs. SFLNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWERX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLNX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SWERX vs. SFLNX - Dividend Comparison

SWERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, more than SFLNX's 1.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SFLNX Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund	1.43%	1.68%	1.78%	1.86%	2.09%	4.78%	6.17%	5.33%	9.69%	3.28%	7.23%	5.68%
SWERX Schwab Target 2040 Fund	6.64%	7.19%	5.00%	3.83%	8.31%	6.96%	3.33%	7.69%	8.57%	4.13%	6.76%	10.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWERX and SFLNX in my portfolio?

SWERX and SFLNX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SWERX or SFLNX?

SWERX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to SFLNX (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWERX dropped -48.24% vs SFLNX's -56.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SFLNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.