PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWDRX vs. SFHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWDRX vs. SFHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2030 Fund (SWDRX) and Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWDRX achieves a 6.57% return, which is significantly higher than SFHIX's 1.36% return. Over the past 10 years, SWDRX has underperformed SFHIX with an annualized return of 8.60%, while SFHIX has yielded a comparatively higher 26.06% annualized return.


SWDRX

1D
0.06%
1M
2.42%
YTD
6.57%
6M
7.21%
1Y
17.44%
3Y*
13.51%
5Y*
6.43%
10Y*
8.60%

SFHIX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.08%
YTD
1.36%
6M
2.17%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
7.51%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*
26.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWDRX vs. SFHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWDRX
Schwab Target 2030 Fund
6.57%14.87%10.52%16.38%-17.00%12.52%13.49%20.41%-7.20%17.55%
SFHIX
Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund
1.36%5.70%8.14%11.50%-0.95%3.90%1.77%588.11%0.53%3.64%

Correlation

The correlation between SWDRX and SFHIX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWDRX vs. SFHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWDRX
SWDRX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SWDRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SFHIX
SFHIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SFHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
SFHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWDRX vs. SFHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2030 Fund (SWDRX) and Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWDRXSFHIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.31

2.99

-0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.29

4.82

-1.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.90

-0.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

2.23

+0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.52

7.89

+4.64

SWDRX vs. SFHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWDRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the SFHIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWDRX and SFHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWDRXSFHIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.99

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

2.70

-2.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.56

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.52

+0.02

Drawdowns

SWDRX vs. SFHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWDRX drawdown since its inception was -45.34%, which is greater than SFHIX's maximum drawdown of -19.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDRX and SFHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWDRXSFHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.34%

-19.94%

-25.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.27%

-2.25%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.71%

-2.25%

-7.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.17%

-5.57%

-22.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.17%

-19.94%

-8.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.48%

-0.84%

-5.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

0.63%

+0.80%

Volatility

SWDRX vs. SFHIX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2030 Fund (SWDRX) has a higher volatility of 2.35% compared to Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX) at 0.46%. This indicates that SWDRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWDRXSFHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

0.46%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.11%

1.43%

+4.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.74%

1.66%

+6.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.58%

2.00%

+10.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.27%

46.69%

-34.42%

SWDRX vs. SFHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWDRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SFHIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWDRX vs. SFHIX - Dividend Comparison

SWDRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.80%, more than SFHIX's 7.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFHIX
Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund
7.61%7.61%8.07%8.06%4.99%3.20%3.93%142.83%5.03%4.00%4.22%4.58%
SWDRX
Schwab Target 2030 Fund
7.80%8.31%6.37%4.28%6.77%6.92%3.23%6.60%7.03%4.86%5.87%9.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWDRX and SFHIX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWDRX has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to SFHIX (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWDRX dropped -45.34% vs SFHIX's -19.94%.

SFHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWDRX and SFHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer