PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFHIX vs. PFLRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFHIX vs. PFLRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX) and Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, SFHIX has outperformed PFLRX with an annualized return of 26.09%, while PFLRX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.72% annualized return.


SFHIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.60%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
7.16%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*
26.09%

PFLRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.43%
YTD
-0.00%
6M
0.44%
1Y
3.28%
3Y*
5.63%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
3.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFHIX vs. PFLRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SFHIX
Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund
1.47%5.70%8.14%11.50%-0.95%3.90%1.77%588.11%0.53%3.64%
PFLRX
Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund
-0.00%4.74%6.34%11.01%-2.78%3.04%0.69%8.14%-0.66%3.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SFHIX and PFLRX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.57

The correlation between SFHIX and PFLRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFHIX vs. PFLRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFHIX
SFHIX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SFHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
SFHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

PFLRX
PFLRX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PFLRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFLRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFLRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PFLRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFLRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFHIX vs. PFLRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX) and Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SFHIXPFLRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.84

1.38

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

1.66

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.61

4.45

+3.16

SFHIX vs. PFLRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFHIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is higher than the PFLRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFHIX and PFLRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SFHIX vs. PFLRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFHIX drawdown since its inception was -19.94%, smaller than the maximum PFLRX drawdown of -32.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFHIX and PFLRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFHIXPFLRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.94%

-32.89%

+12.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.25%

-1.98%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.25%

-3.01%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.57%

-6.95%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.94%

-20.74%

+0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.39%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.83%

-1.74%

+0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

0.74%

-0.11%

Volatility

SFHIX vs. PFLRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX) is 0.47%, while Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX) has a volatility of 0.67%. This indicates that SFHIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFLRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFHIXPFLRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

0.67%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.44%

1.62%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67%

2.36%

-0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.01%

2.83%

-0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.67%

4.01%

+42.66%

SFHIX vs. PFLRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFHIX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than PFLRX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFHIX vs. PFLRX - Dividend Comparison

SFHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%, more than PFLRX's 6.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFLRX
Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund
6.30%6.69%6.25%7.27%3.48%2.63%3.10%4.56%4.54%3.69%3.71%4.45%
SFHIX
Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund
7.60%7.61%8.07%8.06%4.99%3.20%3.93%142.83%5.03%4.00%4.22%4.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFHIX and PFLRX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFLRX has higher volatility (0.67%) compared to SFHIX (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFHIX dropped -19.94% vs PFLRX's -32.89%.

SFHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFHIX and PFLRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer