SWDBY vs. ING
SWDBY (Swedbank AB) and ING (ING Groep N.V.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — SWDBY in Banks - Regional, ING in Banks - Diversified. Over the past 10 years, SWDBY returned 15.97%/yr vs 18.73%/yr for ING. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
SWDBY vs. ING - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWDBY achieves a 27.07% return, which is significantly lower than ING's 29.55% return. Over the past 10 years, SWDBY has underperformed ING with an annualized return of 15.97%, while ING has yielded a comparatively higher 18.73% annualized return.
SWDBY
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 6.32%
- 6M
- 12.87%
- YTD
- 27.07%
- 1Y
- 64.63%
- 3Y*
- 41.41%
- 5Y*
- 25.34%
- 10Y*
- 15.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.15%
ING
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 8.82%
- 6M
- 22.54%
- YTD
- 29.55%
- 1Y
- 62.42%
- 3Y*
- 43.47%
- 5Y*
- 31.75%
- 10Y*
- 18.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $76.55M | $78.41M | $100.20M | |
SWDBY Swedbank AB | $730.73K | $807.94K | $1.01M |
SWDBY vs. ING - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWDBY Swedbank AB | 27.07% | 90.26% | 5.22% | 25.67% | -9.48% | 24.29% | 28.84% | -26.38% | -0.35% | 12.99% |
ING ING Groep N.V. | 29.55% | 91.12% | 12.25% | 31.88% | -4.22% | 55.41% | -21.66% | 20.03% | -41.15% | 35.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWDBY and ING is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007 | 0.58 |
The correlation between SWDBY and ING shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SWDBY:
$45.00B
ING:
$99.78B
SWDBY:
SEK 27.62
ING:
€3.06
SWDBY:
13.83
ING:
9.92
SWDBY:
0.96
ING:
0.59
SWDBY:
3.75
ING:
1.64
SWDBY:
SEK 115.10B
ING:
€40.54B
SWDBY:
SEK 55.14B
ING:
€39.23B
SWDBY:
SEK 39.70B
ING:
€9.83B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWDBY vs. ING — Risk / Return Rank
SWDBY
ING
SWDBY vs. ING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Swedbank AB (SWDBY) and ING Groep N.V. (ING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWDBY | ING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.35 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.84 | 2.93 | +1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.24 | 9.57 | +6.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWDBY vs. ING - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWDBY drawdown since its inception was -94.66%, roughly equal to the maximum ING drawdown of -92.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDBY and ING.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWDBY | ING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.66% | -92.73% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.37% | -19.86% | +6.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.11% | -19.86% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.38% | -43.39% | +2.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.67% | -75.27% | +21.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.03% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.73% | -45.59% | +20.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 6.07% | -2.09% |
Volatility
SWDBY vs. ING - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Swedbank AB (SWDBY) is 7.01%, while ING Groep N.V. (ING) has a volatility of 10.38%. This indicates that SWDBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWDBY | ING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 10.38% | -3.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.43% | 23.06% | -4.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.23% | 27.59% | -5.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.57% | 31.28% | -3.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.71% | 34.31% | -5.60% |
Dividends
SWDBY vs. ING - Dividend Comparison
SWDBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.22%, more than ING's 4.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ING ING Groep N.V. | 4.25% | 4.78% | 7.65% | 5.86% | 7.16% | 5.09% | 0.00% | 5.92% | 2.63% | 3.28% | 4.24% | 2.58% |
SWDBY Swedbank AB | 8.22% | 5.70% | 7.49% | 4.63% | 7.15% | 8.58% | 5.23% | 10.26% | 7.05% | 12.07% | 11.31% | 5.97% |
Financials
SWDBY vs. ING - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Swedbank AB and ING Groep N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SWDBY vs. ING - Profitability Comparison
SWDBY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Swedbank AB reported a gross profit of 17.96B and revenue of 29.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.4%.
ING - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ING Groep N.V. reported a gross profit of 22.79B and revenue of 23.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.8%.
SWDBY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Swedbank AB reported an operating income of 9.15B and revenue of 29.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.
ING - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ING Groep N.V. reported an operating income of 2.92B and revenue of 23.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.
SWDBY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Swedbank AB reported a net income of 7.19B and revenue of 29.24B, resulting in a net margin of 24.6%.
ING - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ING Groep N.V. reported a net income of 1.95B and revenue of 23.07B, resulting in a net margin of 8.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SWDBY and ING have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ING has higher volatility (10.38%) compared to SWDBY (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWDBY dropped -94.66% vs ING's -92.73%.
SWDBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWDBY and ING
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer