SWBGX vs. SWSSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ (SWBGX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX).
SWBGX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Nov 19, 1995. SWSSX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 19, 1997.
Performance
SWBGX vs. SWSSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWBGX vs. SWSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWBGX Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ | -2.12% | 14.73% | 9.10% | 14.99% | -14.35% | 12.85% | 10.50% | 18.56% | -5.43% | 12.70% |
SWSSX Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares | -2.49% | 12.88% | 11.57% | 17.07% | -20.43% | 14.77% | 20.12% | 25.63% | -11.19% | 14.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWBGX achieves a -2.12% return, which is significantly higher than SWSSX's -2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, SWBGX has underperformed SWSSX with an annualized return of 7.36%, while SWSSX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.50% annualized return.
SWBGX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -5.65%
- YTD
- -2.12%
- 6M
- -0.09%
- 1Y
- 11.81%
- 3Y*
- 10.36%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 7.36%
SWSSX
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- YTD
- -2.49%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- 1Y
- 21.55%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWBGX vs. SWSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWBGX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SWSSX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SWBGX vs. SWSSX — Risk / Return Rank
SWBGX
SWSSX
SWBGX vs. SWSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ (SWBGX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWBGX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 0.91 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 1.40 | +0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.18 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 1.33 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.84 | 5.02 | +1.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWBGX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 0.91 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.14 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.40 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.33 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWBGX and SWSSX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWBGX vs. SWSSX - Dividend Comparison
SWBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.86%, more than SWSSX's 1.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWBGX Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ | 7.86% | 7.69% | 10.74% | 4.23% | 4.13% | 5.02% | 6.41% | 4.42% | 7.11% | 5.30% | 3.18% | 14.29% |
SWSSX Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares | 1.32% | 1.29% | 1.66% | 1.49% | 1.32% | 8.88% | 2.55% | 6.12% | 10.45% | 5.22% | 4.10% | 6.92% |
Drawdowns
SWBGX vs. SWSSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWBGX drawdown since its inception was -40.37%, smaller than the maximum SWSSX drawdown of -60.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWBGX and SWSSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWBGX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.37% | -60.34% | +19.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.57% | -13.90% | +6.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.97% | -31.93% | +7.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.97% | -41.81% | +17.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.84% | -11.00% | +5.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -10.78% | +5.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 3.68% | -2.06% |
Volatility
SWBGX vs. SWSSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ (SWBGX) is 3.22%, while Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that SWBGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWBGX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.22% | 6.59% | -3.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.68% | 14.12% | -8.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.13% | 23.11% | -12.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.97% | 22.57% | -11.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.93% | 24.03% | -13.10% |