SWBGX vs. SWCGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ (SWBGX) and Schwab MarketTrack Conservative Portfolio™ (SWCGX).
SWBGX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Nov 19, 1995. SWCGX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Nov 19, 1995.
Performance
SWBGX vs. SWCGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWBGX vs. SWCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWBGX Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ | -2.12% | 14.73% | 9.10% | 14.99% | -14.35% | 12.85% | 10.50% | 18.56% | -5.43% | 12.70% |
SWCGX Schwab MarketTrack Conservative Portfolio™ | -1.40% | 11.95% | 6.32% | 11.61% | -13.76% | 7.66% | 9.41% | 14.91% | -3.70% | 9.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWBGX achieves a -2.12% return, which is significantly lower than SWCGX's -1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, SWBGX has outperformed SWCGX with an annualized return of 7.36%, while SWCGX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.29% annualized return.
SWBGX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -5.65%
- YTD
- -2.12%
- 6M
- -0.09%
- 1Y
- 11.81%
- 3Y*
- 10.36%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 7.36%
SWCGX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- YTD
- -1.40%
- 6M
- 0.25%
- 1Y
- 9.08%
- 3Y*
- 7.91%
- 5Y*
- 3.73%
- 10Y*
- 5.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWBGX vs. SWCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWBGX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SWCGX's 0.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SWBGX vs. SWCGX — Risk / Return Rank
SWBGX
SWCGX
SWBGX vs. SWCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ (SWBGX) and Schwab MarketTrack Conservative Portfolio™ (SWCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWBGX | SWCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 1.28 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 1.82 | -0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.26 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 1.64 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.84 | 7.24 | -0.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWBGX | SWCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 1.28 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.42 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.66 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.72 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWBGX and SWCGX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWBGX vs. SWCGX - Dividend Comparison
SWBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.86%, more than SWCGX's 6.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWBGX Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ | 7.86% | 7.69% | 10.74% | 4.23% | 4.13% | 5.02% | 6.41% | 4.42% | 7.11% | 5.30% | 3.18% | 14.29% |
SWCGX Schwab MarketTrack Conservative Portfolio™ | 6.25% | 6.66% | 10.09% | 6.62% | 4.07% | 4.86% | 3.28% | 3.32% | 4.85% | 3.14% | 2.49% | 7.97% |
Drawdowns
SWBGX vs. SWCGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWBGX drawdown since its inception was -40.37%, which is greater than SWCGX's maximum drawdown of -30.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWBGX and SWCGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWBGX | SWCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.37% | -30.18% | -10.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.57% | -5.42% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.97% | -21.83% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.97% | -21.83% | -2.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.84% | -4.39% | -1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -3.36% | -2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 1.23% | +0.39% |
Volatility
SWBGX vs. SWCGX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ (SWBGX) has a higher volatility of 3.22% compared to Schwab MarketTrack Conservative Portfolio™ (SWCGX) at 2.55%. This indicates that SWBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWBGX | SWCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.22% | 2.55% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.68% | 4.15% | +1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.13% | 7.26% | +2.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.97% | 8.89% | +2.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.93% | 8.09% | +2.84% |