SWCGX vs. SWOBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab MarketTrack Conservative Portfolio™ (SWCGX) and Schwab Balanced Fund™ (SWOBX).
SWCGX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Nov 19, 1995. SWOBX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Nov 17, 1996.
Performance
SWCGX vs. SWOBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWCGX vs. SWOBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWCGX Schwab MarketTrack Conservative Portfolio™ | -0.83% | 11.95% | 6.32% | 11.61% | -13.76% | 7.66% | 9.41% | 14.91% | -3.70% | 9.06% |
SWOBX Schwab Balanced Fund™ | -2.85% | 12.76% | 12.51% | 18.25% | -18.86% | 14.76% | 14.73% | 20.13% | -4.35% | 15.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWCGX achieves a -0.83% return, which is significantly higher than SWOBX's -2.85% return. Over the past 10 years, SWCGX has underperformed SWOBX with an annualized return of 5.35%, while SWOBX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.12% annualized return.
SWCGX
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -3.48%
- YTD
- -0.83%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 9.42%
- 3Y*
- 8.12%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 5.35%
SWOBX
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -4.03%
- YTD
- -2.85%
- 6M
- -1.27%
- 1Y
- 11.81%
- 3Y*
- 10.99%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- 8.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWCGX vs. SWOBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWCGX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than SWOBX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SWCGX vs. SWOBX — Risk / Return Rank
SWCGX
SWOBX
SWCGX vs. SWOBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab MarketTrack Conservative Portfolio™ (SWCGX) and Schwab Balanced Fund™ (SWOBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWCGX | SWOBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 1.07 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | 1.62 | +0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.23 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 1.67 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.84 | 7.16 | +0.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWCGX | SWOBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 1.07 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.40 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.63 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.58 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWCGX and SWOBX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWCGX vs. SWOBX - Dividend Comparison
SWCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.22%, more than SWOBX's 5.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWCGX Schwab MarketTrack Conservative Portfolio™ | 6.22% | 6.66% | 10.09% | 6.62% | 4.07% | 4.86% | 3.28% | 3.32% | 4.85% | 3.14% | 2.49% | 7.97% |
SWOBX Schwab Balanced Fund™ | 5.64% | 5.47% | 4.94% | 5.67% | 10.21% | 6.47% | 2.97% | 5.21% | 7.11% | 3.20% | 7.83% | 7.66% |
Drawdowns
SWCGX vs. SWOBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWCGX drawdown since its inception was -30.18%, smaller than the maximum SWOBX drawdown of -35.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWCGX and SWOBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWCGX | SWOBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.18% | -35.99% | +5.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.42% | -7.36% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.83% | -28.30% | +6.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.83% | -28.30% | +6.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.84% | -4.72% | +0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.36% | -6.25% | +2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 1.72% | -0.47% |
Volatility
SWCGX vs. SWOBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab MarketTrack Conservative Portfolio™ (SWCGX) is 2.67%, while Schwab Balanced Fund™ (SWOBX) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that SWCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWOBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWCGX | SWOBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 4.13% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.18% | 6.62% | -2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.27% | 11.38% | -4.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.89% | 13.94% | -5.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.09% | 12.84% | -4.75% |