SWAN vs. AOA
SWAN (Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF) and AOA (iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - SWAN tracks the S-Network BlackSwan Core Index while AOA tracks the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SWAN returned 2.87%/yr vs 8.78%/yr for AOA. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SWAN charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AOA.
Performance
SWAN vs. AOA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWAN achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly lower than AOA's 8.19% return.
SWAN
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- YTD
- 3.29%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 14.05%
- 3Y*
- 12.19%
- 5Y*
- 2.87%
- 10Y*
- —
AOA
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 7.63%
- 1Y
- 21.66%
- 3Y*
- 16.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
SWAN vs. AOA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF | 3.29% | 13.93% | 13.44% | 12.07% | -27.77% | 10.55% | 16.17% | 22.03% | -2.27% |
AOA iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF | 8.19% | 19.59% | 13.55% | 18.27% | -16.23% | 15.42% | 12.82% | 22.60% | -5.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWAN and AOA is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between SWAN and AOA shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.87 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWAN vs. AOA — Risk / Return Rank
SWAN
AOA
SWAN vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWAN | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.36 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 2.65 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.65 | 11.52 | -3.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWAN vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWAN drawdown since its inception was -31.04%, which is greater than AOA's maximum drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWAN and AOA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWAN | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.04% | -28.38% | -2.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.05% | -8.20% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.07% | -12.94% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.04% | -23.62% | -7.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.43% | -2.08% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.83% | -4.04% | -4.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 1.88% | -0.04% |
Volatility
SWAN vs. AOA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) is 3.97%, while iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that SWAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWAN | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 4.43% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.97% | 9.34% | -1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.00% | 11.25% | -1.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.43% | 13.09% | -1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.49% | 13.51% | -1.02% |
SWAN vs. AOA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWAN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AOA's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWAN vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison
SWAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, more than AOA's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOA iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.08% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 1.67% | 1.71% | 2.50% | 2.37% | 5.09% | 2.26% | 2.15% |
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF | 2.84% | 2.86% | 2.54% | 2.98% | 2.12% | 5.04% | 1.64% | 3.69% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SWAN and AOA have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AOA has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to SWAN (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWAN dropped -31.04% vs AOA's -28.38%.
On 5-year performance, AOA leads with 8.78% vs 2.87% for SWAN. On fees, AOA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SWAN has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AOA has performed better with a 8.78% return vs 2.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AOA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SWAN.
SWAN has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 2.08% for AOA.
SWAN tracks S-Network BlackSwan Core Index, while AOA tracks S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SWAN and 0.15% for AOA.
AOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWAN and AOA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer