PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SVXY vs. WTIU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SVXY vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (SVXY) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVXY achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 87.83% return.


SVXY

1D
1.79%
1M
10.01%
YTD
0.85%
6M
8.91%
1Y
35.62%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
16.17%
10Y*
-1.53%

WTIU

1D
-1.95%
1M
-8.81%
YTD
87.83%
6M
63.25%
1Y
112.38%
3Y*
5.95%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SVXY vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SVXY
ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF
0.85%10.63%-3.17%56.55%
WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
87.83%-17.13%-29.63%-28.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SVXY and WTIU is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023

0.17

The correlation between SVXY and WTIU shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SVXY vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVXY
SVXY Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SVXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVXY Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SVXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVXY Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

WTIU
WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVXY vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (SVXY) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SVXYWTIUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.26

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

2.89

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.10

7.08

-1.98

SVXY vs. WTIU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVXY Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the WTIU Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVXY and WTIU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SVXYWTIUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.68

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

-0.10

+0.32

Drawdowns

SVXY vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVXY drawdown since its inception was -95.25%, which is greater than WTIU's maximum drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVXY and WTIU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SVXYWTIUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.25%

-75.73%

-19.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.94%

-39.11%

+16.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.45%

-75.73%

+29.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.80%

-33.42%

-46.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.87%

-39.18%

-17.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.00%

15.92%

-8.92%

Volatility

SVXY vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (SVXY) is 4.01%, while MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a volatility of 27.11%. This indicates that SVXY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTIU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SVXYWTIUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

27.11%

-23.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.48%

54.96%

-33.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.65%

67.43%

-38.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.37%

70.58%

-35.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.75%

70.58%

-19.83%

SVXY vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVXY has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SVXY vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison

Neither SVXY nor WTIU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SVXY and WTIU have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WTIU has higher volatility (27.11%) compared to SVXY (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVXY dropped -95.25% vs WTIU's -75.73%.

On 3-year performance, SVXY leads with 13.43% vs 5.95% for WTIU. On fees, WTIU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SVXY has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SVXY has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 5.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WTIU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for SVXY.

SVXY and WTIU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

SVXY is categorized as Volatility, while WTIU is Leveraged Equities. SVXY tracks S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures Index (-100%), while WTIU tracks Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.38% for SVXY and 0.95% for WTIU.

WTIU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SVXY and WTIU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer