PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SVR-C.TO vs. KILO-B.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SVR-C.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVR-C.TO achieves a 3.58% return, which is significantly lower than KILO-B.TO's 4.14% return.


SVR-C.TO

1D
-2.08%
1M
2.36%
YTD
3.58%
6M
23.35%
1Y
112.17%
3Y*
46.44%
5Y*
24.24%
10Y*
16.32%

KILO-B.TO

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.62%
YTD
4.14%
6M
5.05%
1Y
34.09%
3Y*
32.71%
5Y*
21.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SVR-C.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SVR-C.TO
iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)
3.58%132.91%30.61%-2.65%9.31%-12.72%43.88%9.28%10.81%
KILO-B.TO
Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged
4.14%56.51%37.76%10.43%6.38%-4.67%21.17%12.88%8.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SVR-C.TO and KILO-B.TO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2018

0.49

Over the past year, SVR-C.TO and KILO-B.TO have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.49, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SVR-C.TO vs. KILO-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVR-C.TO
SVR-C.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SVR-C.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

KILO-B.TO
KILO-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
KILO-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KILO-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
KILO-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
KILO-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
KILO-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVR-C.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SVR-C.TOKILO-B.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.28

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

1.97

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.83

4.86

+0.97

SVR-C.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVR-C.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the KILO-B.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVR-C.TO and KILO-B.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SVR-C.TOKILO-B.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

1.37

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

1.31

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

1.20

-0.97

Drawdowns

SVR-C.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVR-C.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.14%, which is greater than KILO-B.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVR-C.TO and KILO-B.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SVR-C.TOKILO-B.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.14%

-22.54%

-38.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.54%

-17.41%

-24.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.54%

-17.41%

-24.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.54%

-17.41%

-24.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.92%

-15.47%

-20.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.58%

-7.72%

-27.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.30%

7.04%

+12.26%

Volatility

SVR-C.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.01% compared to Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) at 5.43%. This indicates that SVR-C.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KILO-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SVR-C.TOKILO-B.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.01%

5.43%

+10.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.45%

21.50%

+33.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.72%

25.07%

+31.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.57%

16.84%

+19.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.57%

17.99%

+15.58%

SVR-C.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVR-C.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than KILO-B.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

SVR-C.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither SVR-C.TO nor KILO-B.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
KILO-B.TO
Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.69%
SVR-C.TO
iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SVR-C.TO and KILO-B.TO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KILO-B.TO is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KILO-B.TO is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SVR-C.TO.

SVR-C.TO is categorized as Silver, while KILO-B.TO is Gold. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Purpose Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for SVR-C.TO and 0.28% for KILO-B.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SVR-C.TO and KILO-B.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer