SVR-C.TO vs. KILO-B.TO
SVR-C.TO (iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)) and KILO-B.TO (Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - SVR-C.TO is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while KILO-B.TO is a Gold fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. SVR-C.TO is passively managed, while KILO-B.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SVR-C.TO returned 24.24%/yr vs 21.87%/yr for KILO-B.TO. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SVR-C.TO charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for KILO-B.TO.
Performance
SVR-C.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVR-C.TO achieves a 3.58% return, which is significantly lower than KILO-B.TO's 4.14% return.
SVR-C.TO
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 3.58%
- 6M
- 23.35%
- 1Y
- 112.17%
- 3Y*
- 46.44%
- 5Y*
- 24.24%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
KILO-B.TO
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- 1Y
- 34.09%
- 3Y*
- 32.71%
- 5Y*
- 21.87%
- 10Y*
- —
SVR-C.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVR-C.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) | 3.58% | 132.91% | 30.61% | -2.65% | 9.31% | -12.72% | 43.88% | 9.28% | 10.81% |
KILO-B.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged | 4.14% | 56.51% | 37.76% | 10.43% | 6.38% | -4.67% | 21.17% | 12.88% | 8.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVR-C.TO and KILO-B.TO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2018 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, SVR-C.TO and KILO-B.TO have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.49, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVR-C.TO vs. KILO-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SVR-C.TO
KILO-B.TO
SVR-C.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SVR-C.TO | KILO-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.28 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 1.97 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.83 | 4.86 | +0.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SVR-C.TO | KILO-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 1.37 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 1.31 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 1.20 | -0.97 |
Drawdowns
SVR-C.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVR-C.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.14%, which is greater than KILO-B.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVR-C.TO and KILO-B.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVR-C.TO | KILO-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.14% | -22.54% | -38.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.54% | -17.41% | -24.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.54% | -17.41% | -24.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.54% | -17.41% | -24.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.92% | -15.47% | -20.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.58% | -7.72% | -27.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.30% | 7.04% | +12.26% |
Volatility
SVR-C.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.01% compared to Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) at 5.43%. This indicates that SVR-C.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KILO-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVR-C.TO | KILO-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.01% | 5.43% | +10.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.45% | 21.50% | +33.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.72% | 25.07% | +31.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.57% | 16.84% | +19.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.57% | 17.99% | +15.58% |
SVR-C.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SVR-C.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than KILO-B.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
SVR-C.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither SVR-C.TO nor KILO-B.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KILO-B.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% |
SVR-C.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SVR-C.TO and KILO-B.TO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KILO-B.TO is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KILO-B.TO is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SVR-C.TO.
SVR-C.TO is categorized as Silver, while KILO-B.TO is Gold. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Purpose Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for SVR-C.TO and 0.28% for KILO-B.TO.
Find the right allocation for SVR-C.TO and KILO-B.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer