KILO-B.TO vs. AGCC.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) and Global X Silver Covered Call ETF (AGCC.TO).

KILO-B.TO and AGCC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KILO-B.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Oct 15, 2018. AGCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Oct 7, 2025.

Performance

KILO-B.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) and Global X Silver Covered Call ETF (AGCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KILO-B.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KILO-B.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged	9.94%	4.74%
AGCC.TO Global X Silver Covered Call ETF	1.84%	37.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KILO-B.TO achieves a 9.94% return, which is significantly higher than AGCC.TO's 1.84% return.

KILO-B.TO

• 1D: 3.80%
• 1M: -9.42%
• YTD: 9.94%
• 6M: 21.41%
• 1Y: 44.69%
• 3Y*: 34.39%
• 5Y*: 24.48%
• 10Y*: —

AGCC.TO

• 1D: 6.26%
• 1M: -18.74%
• YTD: 1.84%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KILO-B.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

KILO-B.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than AGCC.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.

AGCC.TO

Global X Silver Covered Call ETF

KILO-B.TO

Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged

Return for Risk

KILO-B.TO vs. AGCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KILO-B.TO

KILO-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 84
KILO-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
KILO-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
KILO-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 83
KILO-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
KILO-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KILO-B.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) and Global X Silver Covered Call ETF (AGCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KILO-B.TO	AGCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.62	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KILO-B.TO	AGCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.30	1.47	-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between KILO-B.TO and AGCC.TO is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

KILO-B.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

KILO-B.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KILO-B.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.69%
AGCC.TO Global X Silver Covered Call ETF	3.06%	1.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

KILO-B.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KILO-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, smaller than the maximum AGCC.TO drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KILO-B.TO and AGCC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	KILO-B.TO	AGCC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.54%	-39.17%	+16.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.76%	-32.50%	+21.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.59%	-11.78%	+4.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.93%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KILO-B.TO	AGCC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.07%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.98%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.05%	70.54%	-44.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.59%	70.54%	-53.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.98%	70.54%	-52.56%