SVR-C.TO vs. AGCC.TO
SVR-C.TO (iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)) and AGCC.TO (Global X Silver Covered Call ETF) are both Silver funds. SVR-C.TO is passively managed, while AGCC.TO is actively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SVR-C.TO charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for AGCC.TO.
Performance
SVR-C.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVR-C.TO achieves a 3.58% return, which is significantly higher than AGCC.TO's 1.95% return.
SVR-C.TO
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 3.58%
- 6M
- 23.35%
- 1Y
- 112.17%
- 3Y*
- 46.44%
- 5Y*
- 24.24%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
AGCC.TO
- 1D
- -2.45%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 19.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SVR-C.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SVR-C.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) | 3.58% | 41.48% |
AGCC.TO Global X Silver Covered Call ETF | 1.95% | 37.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVR-C.TO and AGCC.TO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVR-C.TO vs. AGCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SVR-C.TO
AGCC.TO
SVR-C.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) and Global X Silver Covered Call ETF (AGCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SVR-C.TO | AGCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.83 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SVR-C.TO | AGCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 1.06 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
SVR-C.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVR-C.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.14%, which is greater than AGCC.TO's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVR-C.TO and AGCC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVR-C.TO | AGCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.14% | -39.17% | -21.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.92% | -32.43% | -3.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.58% | -16.63% | -18.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.30% | — | — |
Volatility
SVR-C.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVR-C.TO | AGCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.72% | 64.60% | -7.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.57% | 64.60% | -28.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.57% | 64.60% | -31.03% |
SVR-C.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SVR-C.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than AGCC.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SVR-C.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Dividend Comparison
SVR-C.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AGCC.TO Global X Silver Covered Call ETF | 5.55% | 1.49% |
SVR-C.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, SVR-C.TO and AGCC.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, AGCC.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AGCC.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SVR-C.TO.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for SVR-C.TO and 0.60% for AGCC.TO.
Find the right allocation for SVR-C.TO and AGCC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer