AGCC.TO vs. SILJ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Silver Covered Call ETF (AGCC.TO) and ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ).

AGCC.TO and SILJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AGCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Oct 7, 2025. SILJ is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Junior Silver Miners & Explorers Index. It was launched on Nov 28, 2012.

Performance

AGCC.TO vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Silver Covered Call ETF (AGCC.TO) and ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AGCC.TO vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AGCC.TO Global X Silver Covered Call ETF	1.84%	37.24%
SILJ ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF	8.86%	11.63%

Different Trading Currencies

AGCC.TO is traded in CAD, while SILJ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SILJ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGCC.TO achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly lower than SILJ's 8.86% return.

AGCC.TO

• 1D: 6.26%
• 1M: -18.74%
• YTD: 1.84%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SILJ

• 1D: 8.70%
• 1M: -24.80%
• YTD: 8.86%
• 6M: 31.02%
• 1Y: 141.51%
• 3Y*: 44.26%
• 5Y*: 19.13%
• 10Y*: 15.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGCC.TO vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGCC.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.

SILJ

ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF

AGCC.TO

Global X Silver Covered Call ETF

Return for Risk

AGCC.TO vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SILJ

SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 95
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGCC.TO vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Covered Call ETF (AGCC.TO) and ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AGCC.TO	SILJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.47	0.15	+1.32

Correlation

The correlation between AGCC.TO and SILJ is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AGCC.TO vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison

AGCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than SILJ's 1.86% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AGCC.TO Global X Silver Covered Call ETF	3.06%	1.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SILJ ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF	1.86%	2.00%	7.26%	0.01%	0.05%	0.36%	1.23%	1.45%	1.66%	0.00%	0.52%	2.46%

Drawdowns

AGCC.TO vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -69.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGCC.TO and SILJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGCC.TO	SILJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.17%	-79.04%	+39.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.71%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-56.09%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-70.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.50%	-26.25%	-6.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.78%	-41.67%	+29.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AGCC.TO	SILJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	21.33%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	45.68%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.54%	53.28%	+17.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.54%	41.29%	+29.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.54%	44.21%	+26.33%