PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SVR-C.TO vs. ABX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SVR-C.TO vs. ABX.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

SVR-C.TO (iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while ABX.TO (Barrick Gold Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SVR-C.TO returned 12.54%/yr vs 8.78%/yr for ABX.TO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SVR-C.TO vs. ABX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) and Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVR-C.TO achieves a -14.35% return, which is significantly lower than ABX.TO's -11.68% return. Over the past 10 years, SVR-C.TO has outperformed ABX.TO with an annualized return of 12.54%, while ABX.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.78% annualized return.

SVR-C.TO

1D
1.87%
1M
-19.40%
YTD
-14.35%
6M
-19.83%
1Y
70.15%
3Y*
39.87%
5Y*
20.27%
10Y*
12.54%

ABX.TO

1D
-0.61%
1M
-11.46%
YTD
-11.68%
6M
-12.84%
1Y
88.14%
3Y*
35.59%
5Y*
18.91%
10Y*
8.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SVR-C.TO vs. ABX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SVR-C.TO
iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)		-14.35%132.91%30.61%-2.65%9.69%-13.03%43.88%9.28%-2.35%-2.30%
ABX.TO
Barrick Gold Corporation		-11.68%173.89%-4.69%5.66%1.61%-13.98%21.72%31.81%2.15%-14.89%

Correlation

The correlation between SVR-C.TO and ABX.TO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2012

0.42

Over the past year, SVR-C.TO and ABX.TO have become more correlated (0.69) than their long-term average of 0.42, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)

Barrick Gold Corporation

Often compared with SVR-C.TO:
SVR-C.TO vs. SVR.TOSVR-C.TO vs. PSLV.TOSVR-C.TO vs. MNS.TOSVR-C.TO vs. SBT.TOSVR-C.TO vs. HUG.TOSVR-C.TO vs. CGL.TOSVR-C.TO vs. GDX
Often compared with ABX.TO:
ABX.TO vs. GOLDABX.TO vs. AEM.TOABX.TO vs. AGI.TOABX.TO vs. CGL-C.TOABX.TO vs. GDXABX.TO vs. PHYS.TOABX.TO vs. GWO.TO

Return for Risk

SVR-C.TO vs. ABX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SVR-C.TO
SVR-C.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SVR-C.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
ABX.TO
ABX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ABX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVR-C.TO vs. ABX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) and Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

SVR-C.TOABX.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.20
1.94

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.58
2.34

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

3.11

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.11

7.06

-3.95

SVR-C.TO vs. ABX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVR-C.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the ABX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVR-C.TO and ABX.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SVR-C.TO vs. ABX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVR-C.TO drawdown since its inception was -53.26%, smaller than the maximum ABX.TO drawdown of -84.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVR-C.TO and ABX.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SVR-C.TOABX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.26%

-84.64%

+31.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.86%

-28.49%

-20.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.86%

-28.49%

-20.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.86%

-43.11%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.86%

-56.74%

+7.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.01%

-26.51%

-20.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.94%

-40.58%

+11.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.60%

12.52%

+10.08%

Volatility

SVR-C.TO vs. ABX.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) and Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO) have volatilities of 15.32% and 15.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SVR-C.TOABX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.32%

15.15%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.48%

35.57%

+20.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.58%

45.59%

+12.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.84%

34.80%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.73%

35.89%

-4.16%

Dividends

SVR-C.TO vs. ABX.TO - Dividend Comparison

SVR-C.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABX.TO
Barrick Gold Corporation		2.42%1.22%2.46%2.27%5.06%3.96%1.33%0.60%0.65%0.72%0.47%1.43%
SVR-C.TO
iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

SVR-C.TO and ABX.TO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SVR-C.TO and ABX.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer