SVOL vs. MTBA
SVOL (Simplify Volatility Premium ETF) and MTBA (Simplify MBS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SVOL is a Volatility fund actively managed by Simplify, while MTBA is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SVOL returned 10.62% vs 5.18% for MTBA. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SVOL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTBA.
Performance
SVOL vs. MTBA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVOL achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than MTBA's -0.23% return.
SVOL
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 10.62%
- 3Y*
- 6.58%
- 5Y*
- 6.70%
- 10Y*
- —
MTBA
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SVOL vs. MTBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SVOL Simplify Volatility Premium ETF | -0.40% | 2.41% | 6.77% | 3.34% |
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | -0.23% | 7.74% | 1.99% | 3.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVOL and MTBA is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023 | 0.22 |
SVOL vs. MTBA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SVOL
MTBA
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SVOL
MTBA
-
Financial Services
SVOL
MTBA
Industrials
SVOL
MTBA
-
Healthcare
SVOL
MTBA
-
Consumer Cyclical
SVOL
MTBA
-
Communication Services
SVOL
MTBA
-
Consumer Defensive
SVOL
MTBA
-
Energy
SVOL
MTBA
-
Real Estate
SVOL
MTBA
-
Basic Materials
SVOL
MTBA
-
Utilities
SVOL
MTBA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVOL vs. MTBA — Risk / Return Rank
SVOL
MTBA
SVOL vs. MTBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SVOL | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.32 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 1.84 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.94 | 6.28 | -4.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SVOL | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 1.68 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 1.30 | -0.95 |
Drawdowns
SVOL vs. MTBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVOL drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, which is greater than MTBA's maximum drawdown of -3.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVOL and MTBA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVOL | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.50% | -3.48% | -30.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.01% | -2.82% | -10.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.98% | -1.60% | -1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.77% | -0.79% | -3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.49% | 0.83% | +4.66% |
Volatility
SVOL vs. MTBA - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL) has a higher volatility of 1.41% compared to Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) at 1.33%. This indicates that SVOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVOL | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | 1.33% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.57% | 2.47% | +7.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.90% | 3.10% | +17.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.99% | 3.95% | +18.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.92% | 3.95% | +17.97% |
SVOL vs. MTBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SVOL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MTBA's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SVOL vs. MTBA - Dividend Comparison
SVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.10%, more than MTBA's 6.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | 6.09% | 5.98% | 6.03% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SVOL Simplify Volatility Premium ETF | 22.10% | 19.82% | 16.79% | 16.36% | 18.32% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SVOL and MTBA have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SVOL has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to MTBA (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVOL dropped -33.50% vs MTBA's -3.48%.
On 1-year performance, SVOL leads with 10.62% vs 5.18% for MTBA. On fees, MTBA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SVOL has performed better with a 10.62% return vs 5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTBA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SVOL.
SVOL has the higher dividend yield at 22.10%, compared with 6.09% for MTBA.
SVOL is categorized as Volatility, while MTBA is Mortgage Backed Securities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SVOL and 0.15% for MTBA.
MTBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SVOL and MTBA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer