SVM vs. NRJL.L
SVM (Silvercorp Metals Inc.) is a stock, while NRJL.L (Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) is Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Over the past 10 years, SVM returned 16.92%/yr vs 9.77%/yr for NRJL.L. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SVM vs. NRJL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SVM is traded in USD, while NRJL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the NRJL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVM achieves a 21.23% return, which is significantly lower than NRJL.L's 36.22% return. Over the past 10 years, SVM has outperformed NRJL.L with an annualized return of 16.92%, while NRJL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.77% annualized return.
SVM
- 1D
- -7.51%
- 1M
- -20.20%
- YTD
- 21.23%
- 6M
- 17.83%
- 1Y
- 140.00%
- 3Y*
- 53.92%
- 5Y*
- 13.81%
- 10Y*
- 16.92%
NRJL.L
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- 36.22%
- 6M
- 35.32%
- 1Y
- 72.67%
- 3Y*
- 12.73%
- 5Y*
- 2.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.77%
SVM vs. NRJL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 21.23% | 179.29% | 14.88% | -10.33% | -20.60% | -43.52% | 18.54% | 172.27% | -18.96% | 12.52% |
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 36.22% | 45.70% | -13.04% | -18.80% | -18.49% | -6.26% | 37.17% | 53.22% | -12.97% | 26.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVM and NRJL.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009 | 0.25 |
The correlation between SVM and NRJL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (10 years) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVM vs. NRJL.L — Risk / Return Rank
SVM
NRJL.L
SVM vs. NRJL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) and Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SVM | NRJL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.53 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 6.92 | -3.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.64 | 22.97 | -13.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SVM vs. NRJL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVM drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, which is greater than NRJL.L's maximum drawdown of -57.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVM and NRJL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVM | NRJL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.00% | -57.04% | -40.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.02% | -10.45% | -28.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.86% | -39.74% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.98% | -56.16% | -6.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.19% | -57.04% | -19.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.92% | -3.29% | -45.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.59% | -28.42% | -43.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.57% | 3.15% | +11.42% |
Volatility
SVM vs. NRJL.L - Volatility Comparison
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) has a higher volatility of 27.03% compared to Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) at 9.76%. This indicates that SVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRJL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVM | NRJL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.03% | 9.76% | +17.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.80% | 18.71% | +39.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.44% | 22.20% | +48.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.00% | 24.34% | +31.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.93% | 23.74% | +38.19% |
Dividends
SVM vs. NRJL.L - Dividend Comparison
SVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than NRJL.L's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.30% | 0.42% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.70% | 1.02% | 0.59% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.83% | 0.95% | 0.84% | 0.66% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SVM and NRJL.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SVM and NRJL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer