SVM vs. BTG
SVM (Silvercorp Metals Inc.) and BTG (B2Gold Corp.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — SVM in Silver, BTG in Gold. Over the past 10 years, SVM returned 19.41%/yr vs 9.37%/yr for BTG. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SVM vs. BTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVM achieves a 35.63% return, which is significantly higher than BTG's -5.82% return. Over the past 10 years, SVM has outperformed BTG with an annualized return of 19.41%, while BTG has yielded a comparatively lower 9.37% annualized return.
SVM
- 1D
- 7.52%
- 1M
- -28.00%
- YTD
- 35.63%
- 6M
- 39.13%
- 1Y
- 166.61%
- 3Y*
- 57.23%
- 5Y*
- 13.01%
- 10Y*
- 19.41%
BTG
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -21.06%
- YTD
- -5.82%
- 6M
- -7.67%
- 1Y
- 15.53%
- 3Y*
- 8.86%
- 5Y*
- 1.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
SVM vs. BTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 35.63% | 179.29% | 14.88% | -10.33% | -20.60% | -43.52% | 18.54% | 172.27% | -18.96% | 12.52% |
BTG B2Gold Corp. | -5.82% | 88.95% | -18.07% | -7.22% | -5.13% | -26.97% | 42.35% | 37.72% | -5.81% | 30.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVM and BTG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2008 | 0.57 |
The correlation between SVM and BTG shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SVM:
$2.50B
BTG:
$6.32B
SVM:
-$0.05
BTG:
$0.36
SVM:
5.67
BTG:
1.74
SVM:
2.65
BTG:
1.72
SVM:
$437.11M
BTG:
$3.67B
SVM:
$254.02M
BTG:
$1.89B
SVM:
$185.32M
BTG:
$1.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVM vs. BTG — Risk / Return Rank
SVM
BTG
SVM vs. BTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) and B2Gold Corp. (BTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SVM | BTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.10 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.30 | 0.42 | +3.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.58 | 0.83 | +11.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SVM vs. BTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVM drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, which is greater than BTG's maximum drawdown of -85.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVM and BTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVM | BTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.00% | -85.97% | -12.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.02% | -36.97% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.86% | -36.97% | -5.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.44% | -48.92% | -18.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.19% | -63.35% | -12.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.85% | -31.60% | -11.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.64% | -38.35% | -33.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.30% | 18.70% | -5.40% |
Volatility
SVM vs. BTG - Volatility Comparison
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) has a higher volatility of 26.97% compared to B2Gold Corp. (BTG) at 15.76%. This indicates that SVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVM | BTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.97% | 15.76% | +11.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.61% | 44.50% | +12.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.31% | 55.48% | +13.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.63% | 44.82% | +10.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.77% | 48.23% | +13.54% |
Dividends
SVM vs. BTG - Dividend Comparison
SVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than BTG's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTG B2Gold Corp. | 1.90% | 1.77% | 6.56% | 5.06% | 4.48% | 4.07% | 1.96% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.83% | 0.95% | 0.84% | 0.66% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 2.13% |
Financials
SVM vs. BTG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silvercorp Metals Inc. and B2Gold Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SVM vs. BTG - Profitability Comparison
SVM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported a gross profit of 99.96M and revenue of 145.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.8%.
BTG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B2Gold Corp. reported a gross profit of 601.32M and revenue of 1.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.6%.
SVM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported an operating income of 93.44M and revenue of 145.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 64.3%.
BTG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B2Gold Corp. reported an operating income of 572.52M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 50.1%.
SVM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported a net income of -606.31K and revenue of 145.32M, resulting in a net margin of -0.4%.
BTG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B2Gold Corp. reported a net income of 197.17M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in a net margin of 17.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SVM and BTG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SVM has higher volatility (26.97%) compared to BTG (15.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVM dropped -98.00% vs BTG's -85.97%.
SVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SVM and BTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer