SVBAX vs. FSRTX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SVBAX (John Hancock Balanced Fund) and FSRTX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, SVBAX returned 10.17%/yr vs 5.25%/yr for FSRTX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SVBAX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FSRTX.

Performance

SVBAX vs. FSRTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M (FSRTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVBAX achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly higher than FSRTX's 6.49% return. Over the past 10 years, SVBAX has outperformed FSRTX with an annualized return of 10.17%, while FSRTX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.25% annualized return.

SVBAX

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 9.14%
• 6M: 8.48%
• 1Y: 20.36%
• 3Y*: 15.84%
• 5Y*: 8.63%
• 10Y*: 10.17%

FSRTX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.68%
• YTD: 6.49%
• 6M: 6.25%
• 1Y: 12.46%
• 3Y*: 9.00%
• 5Y*: 5.67%
• 10Y*: 5.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SVBAX vs. FSRTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SVBAX John Hancock Balanced Fund	9.14%	15.69%	13.31%	18.22%	-15.79%	14.49%	15.97%	21.28%	-5.02%	13.40%
FSRTX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M	6.49%	10.08%	5.57%	4.33%	-3.58%	15.50%	3.49%	10.24%	-4.26%	3.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SVBAX and FSRTX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2005	0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between SVBAX and FSRTX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

SVBAX vs. FSRTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVBAX

SVBAX Risk / Return Rank: 84
SVBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
SVBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
SVBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
SVBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
SVBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

FSRTX

FSRTX Risk / Return Rank: 85
FSRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FSRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FSRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FSRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FSRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVBAX vs. FSRTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M (FSRTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SVBAX	FSRTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	2.52	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.54	3.46	+0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.48	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.89	4.53	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.57	18.21	+0.37

SVBAX vs. FSRTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVBAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the FSRTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVBAX and FSRTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SVBAX vs. FSRTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVBAX drawdown since its inception was -40.81%, which is greater than FSRTX's maximum drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVBAX and FSRTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SVBAX	FSRTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.81%	-33.57%	-7.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.57%	-2.70%	-2.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.06%	-5.87%	-6.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.53%	-12.89%	-7.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.00%	-19.88%	-1.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	-2.70%	+1.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.23%	-4.41%	-0.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.16%	0.67%	+0.49%

Volatility

SVBAX vs. FSRTX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M (FSRTX) at 1.37%. This indicates that SVBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SVBAX	FSRTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.56%	1.37%	+2.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.09%	3.83%	+3.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.76%	4.88%	+3.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.87%	6.91%	+3.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.81%	6.74%	+4.07%

SVBAX vs. FSRTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVBAX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRTX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SVBAX vs. FSRTX - Dividend Comparison

SVBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.48%, more than FSRTX's 3.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSRTX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M	3.96%	4.44%	4.56%	5.05%	7.07%	5.14%	2.02%	2.81%	9.10%	2.32%	2.06%	1.41%
SVBAX John Hancock Balanced Fund	11.48%	12.45%	3.72%	1.48%	1.60%	2.73%	1.60%	2.19%	8.06%	3.51%	1.70%	4.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SVBAX and FSRTX in my portfolio?

SVBAX and FSRTX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SVBAX or FSRTX?

SVBAX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to FSRTX (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVBAX dropped -40.81% vs FSRTX's -33.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.