PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUVZX vs. PBHAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUVZX vs. PBHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Value Fund (SUVZX) and PGIM High Yield Fund (PBHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUVZX achieves a 15.71% return, which is significantly higher than PBHAX's 1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, SUVZX has outperformed PBHAX with an annualized return of 12.50%, while PBHAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.20% annualized return.


SUVZX

1D
0.56%
1M
3.78%
YTD
15.71%
6M
16.74%
1Y
33.17%
3Y*
25.44%
5Y*
12.95%
10Y*
12.50%

PBHAX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.15%
YTD
1.69%
6M
2.38%
1Y
7.15%
3Y*
8.10%
5Y*
3.29%
10Y*
5.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUVZX vs. PBHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUVZX
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Value Fund
15.71%17.92%29.20%9.39%-6.46%31.08%-6.15%28.63%-14.99%15.87%
PBHAX
PGIM High Yield Fund
1.69%8.79%6.89%10.75%-12.51%5.63%4.87%15.86%-1.53%7.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SUVZX and PBHAX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002

0.31

The correlation between SUVZX and PBHAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUVZX vs. PBHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUVZX
SUVZX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SUVZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUVZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUVZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SUVZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUVZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

PBHAX
PBHAX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PBHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PBHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUVZX vs. PBHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Value Fund (SUVZX) and PGIM High Yield Fund (PBHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUVZXPBHAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.50

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.79

2.90

+2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.05

14.52

+8.53

SUVZX vs. PBHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUVZX Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is higher than the PBHAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUVZX and PBHAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUVZXPBHAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07

2.02

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.65

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.95

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

1.35

-0.93

Drawdowns

SUVZX vs. PBHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUVZX drawdown since its inception was -60.47%, which is greater than PBHAX's maximum drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUVZX and PBHAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUVZXPBHAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.47%

-28.80%

-31.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.75%

-2.48%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.29%

-4.06%

-12.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.74%

-16.22%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.82%

-21.14%

-25.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.71%

-2.87%

-6.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

0.49%

+0.95%

Volatility

SUVZX vs. PBHAX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Value Fund (SUVZX) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to PGIM High Yield Fund (PBHAX) at 1.18%. This indicates that SUVZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUVZXPBHAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

1.18%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.00%

2.72%

+5.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.89%

3.56%

+7.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.90%

5.06%

+12.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.05%

5.49%

+15.56%

SUVZX vs. PBHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUVZX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PBHAX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SUVZX vs. PBHAX - Dividend Comparison

SUVZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.39%, more than PBHAX's 6.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBHAX
PGIM High Yield Fund
6.73%6.71%6.01%5.73%5.94%5.88%5.70%5.96%6.26%5.98%4.61%6.64%
SUVZX
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Value Fund
14.39%16.65%31.72%3.81%10.19%9.27%2.09%10.08%14.33%9.58%4.35%18.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUVZX and PBHAX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SUVZX has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to PBHAX (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUVZX dropped -60.47% vs PBHAX's -28.80%.

SUVZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUVZX and PBHAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer