PBHAX vs. INPFX
PBHAX (PGIM High Yield Fund) and INPFX (American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1) are both mutual funds - PBHAX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by PGIM, while INPFX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by American Funds. Over the past 10 years, PBHAX returned 5.22%/yr vs 7.23%/yr for INPFX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBHAX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for INPFX.
Performance
PBHAX vs. INPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBHAX achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly lower than INPFX's 4.70% return. Over the past 10 years, PBHAX has underperformed INPFX with an annualized return of 5.22%, while INPFX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.23% annualized return.
PBHAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 2.38%
- 1Y
- 7.60%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.22%
INPFX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 4.70%
- 6M
- 5.61%
- 1Y
- 13.77%
- 3Y*
- 11.84%
- 5Y*
- 6.40%
- 10Y*
- 7.23%
PBHAX vs. INPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBHAX PGIM High Yield Fund | 1.69% | 8.79% | 6.89% | 10.75% | -12.51% | 5.63% | 4.87% | 15.86% | -1.53% | 7.50% |
INPFX American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 | 4.70% | 14.29% | 9.20% | 9.46% | -8.74% | 12.90% | 5.67% | 15.76% | -3.57% | 11.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBHAX and INPFX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012 | 0.51 |
The correlation between PBHAX and INPFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBHAX vs. INPFX — Risk / Return Rank
PBHAX
INPFX
PBHAX vs. INPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM High Yield Fund (PBHAX) and American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBHAX | INPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.08 | 2.38 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.60 | 3.41 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.46 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 2.73 | +0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.17 | 11.64 | +4.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBHAX | INPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 2.38 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.85 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | 0.87 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 0.93 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
PBHAX vs. INPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBHAX drawdown since its inception was -28.80%, which is greater than INPFX's maximum drawdown of -21.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBHAX and INPFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBHAX | INPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.80% | -21.31% | -7.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.48% | -5.20% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.06% | -7.02% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.22% | -15.37% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.14% | -21.31% | +0.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.20% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.87% | -2.30% | -0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.49% | 1.22% | -0.73% |
Volatility
PBHAX vs. INPFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM High Yield Fund (PBHAX) is 1.16%, while American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX) has a volatility of 1.82%. This indicates that PBHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBHAX | INPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 1.82% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.80% | 4.74% | -1.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.57% | 5.93% | -2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.06% | 7.53% | -2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.49% | 8.36% | -2.87% |
PBHAX vs. INPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBHAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than INPFX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBHAX vs. INPFX - Dividend Comparison
PBHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, more than INPFX's 5.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INPFX American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 | 5.29% | 5.61% | 5.15% | 4.76% | 4.84% | 4.38% | 5.54% | 4.53% | 4.79% | 3.25% | 3.53% | 3.85% |
PBHAX PGIM High Yield Fund | 6.73% | 6.71% | 6.01% | 5.73% | 5.94% | 5.88% | 5.70% | 5.96% | 6.26% | 5.98% | 4.61% | 6.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBHAX and INPFX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INPFX has higher volatility (1.82%) compared to PBHAX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBHAX dropped -28.80% vs INPFX's -21.31%.
INPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBHAX and INPFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer