PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUVZX vs. LEXCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUVZX vs. LEXCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Value Fund (SUVZX) and Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUVZX achieves a 16.36% return, which is significantly higher than LEXCX's 14.99% return. Over the past 10 years, SUVZX has outperformed LEXCX with an annualized return of 12.80%, while LEXCX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.44% annualized return.


SUVZX

1D
0.56%
1M
3.08%
YTD
16.36%
6M
15.24%
1Y
33.06%
3Y*
23.96%
5Y*
14.51%
10Y*
12.80%

LEXCX

1D
-0.72%
1M
-3.69%
YTD
14.99%
6M
14.68%
1Y
17.81%
3Y*
12.67%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
11.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUVZX vs. LEXCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUVZX
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Value Fund
16.36%17.92%29.20%9.39%-6.46%31.08%-6.15%28.63%-14.99%15.87%
LEXCX
Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund
14.99%7.04%3.60%14.53%3.95%26.77%4.36%21.43%-5.44%16.61%

Correlation

The correlation between SUVZX and LEXCX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2002

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between SUVZX and LEXCX has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUVZX vs. LEXCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUVZX
SUVZX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SUVZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUVZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUVZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SUVZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUVZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

LEXCX
LEXCX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LEXCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEXCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEXCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
LEXCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEXCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUVZX vs. LEXCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Value Fund (SUVZX) and Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SUVZXLEXCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.25

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.81

3.19

+2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.91

7.85

+15.06

SUVZX vs. LEXCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUVZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is higher than the LEXCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUVZX and LEXCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SUVZX vs. LEXCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUVZX drawdown since its inception was -60.47%, which is greater than LEXCX's maximum drawdown of -50.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUVZX and LEXCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUVZXLEXCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.47%

-50.42%

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.75%

-6.22%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.29%

-14.03%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.74%

-19.75%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.82%

-39.21%

-7.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-5.61%

+4.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.69%

-7.12%

-2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

2.48%

-1.02%

Volatility

SUVZX vs. LEXCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Value Fund (SUVZX) is 3.95%, while Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) has a volatility of 4.73%. This indicates that SUVZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEXCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUVZXLEXCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

4.73%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.47%

10.93%

-2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.25%

14.06%

-2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.91%

16.52%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.07%

19.01%

+2.06%

SUVZX vs. LEXCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUVZX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than LEXCX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

SUVZX vs. LEXCX - Dividend Comparison

SUVZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.31%, more than LEXCX's 1.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LEXCX
Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund
1.43%1.65%1.66%1.58%1.65%1.54%1.91%1.86%2.03%1.79%3.93%2.37%
SUVZX
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Value Fund
14.31%16.65%31.72%3.81%10.19%9.27%2.09%10.08%14.33%9.58%4.35%18.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUVZX and LEXCX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEXCX has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to SUVZX (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUVZX dropped -60.47% vs LEXCX's -50.42%.

SUVZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUVZX and LEXCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer