PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBHAX vs. PFIUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBHAX vs. PFIUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM High Yield Fund (PBHAX) and PIMCO Dynamic Bond Fund (PFIUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBHAX achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly higher than PFIUX's 1.10% return. Over the past 10 years, PBHAX has outperformed PFIUX with an annualized return of 5.22%, while PFIUX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.91% annualized return.


PBHAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.69%
6M
2.17%
1Y
7.37%
3Y*
8.10%
5Y*
3.33%
10Y*
5.22%

PFIUX

1D
0.20%
1M
1.16%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.78%
1Y
7.70%
3Y*
7.49%
5Y*
2.98%
10Y*
3.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBHAX vs. PFIUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBHAX
PGIM High Yield Fund
1.69%8.79%6.89%10.75%-12.51%5.63%4.87%15.86%-1.53%7.50%
PFIUX
PIMCO Dynamic Bond Fund
1.10%9.30%7.12%6.83%-7.48%0.32%5.43%4.83%1.98%6.41%

Correlation

The correlation between PBHAX and PFIUX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2008

0.37

Over the past year, PBHAX and PFIUX have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBHAX vs. PFIUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBHAX
PBHAX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PBHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PBHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PFIUX
PFIUX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PFIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
PFIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBHAX vs. PFIUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM High Yield Fund (PBHAX) and PIMCO Dynamic Bond Fund (PFIUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBHAXPFIUXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.15

2.28

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.72

3.80

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.51

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.68

+0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.43

10.45

+4.98

PBHAX vs. PFIUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBHAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the PFIUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBHAX and PFIUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBHAXPFIUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.28

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.99

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

1.37

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.35

1.29

+0.06

Drawdowns

PBHAX vs. PFIUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBHAX drawdown since its inception was -28.80%, which is greater than PFIUX's maximum drawdown of -10.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBHAX and PFIUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBHAXPFIUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.80%

-10.67%

-18.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.48%

-2.89%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.06%

-2.89%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.22%

-10.67%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.14%

-10.67%

-10.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-1.48%

-1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.49%

0.74%

-0.25%

Volatility

PBHAX vs. PFIUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM High Yield Fund (PBHAX) is 1.16%, while PIMCO Dynamic Bond Fund (PFIUX) has a volatility of 1.43%. This indicates that PBHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFIUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBHAXPFIUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

1.43%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.71%

2.81%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.56%

3.40%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.06%

3.03%

+2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.49%

2.87%

+2.62%

PBHAX vs. PFIUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBHAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PFIUX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBHAX vs. PFIUX - Dividend Comparison

PBHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, more than PFIUX's 5.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBHAX
PGIM High Yield Fund
6.73%6.71%6.01%5.73%5.94%5.88%5.70%5.96%6.26%5.98%4.61%6.64%
PFIUX
PIMCO Dynamic Bond Fund
5.54%5.15%4.68%3.65%3.67%2.03%3.45%5.14%3.48%4.69%2.31%6.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBHAX and PFIUX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFIUX has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to PBHAX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBHAX dropped -28.80% vs PFIUX's -10.67%.

PFIUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBHAX and PFIUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer