SUSM.L vs. EMHD.L
SUSM.L (iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and EMHD.L (Invesco FTSE Emerging Markets High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - SUSM.L tracks the MSCI EM SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index while EMHD.L tracks the FTSE Emerging High Dividend Low Volatility Net Tax Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SUSM.L returned 3.24%/yr vs 5.39%/yr for EMHD.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SUSM.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMHD.L.
Performance
SUSM.L vs. EMHD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUSM.L achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly higher than EMHD.L's 6.65% return.
SUSM.L
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- 10.99%
- 6M
- 13.35%
- 1Y
- 32.03%
- 3Y*
- 15.03%
- 5Y*
- 3.24%
- 10Y*
- —
EMHD.L
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -3.79%
- YTD
- 6.65%
- 6M
- 6.38%
- 1Y
- 22.75%
- 3Y*
- 14.37%
- 5Y*
- 5.39%
- 10Y*
- 6.88%
SUSM.L vs. EMHD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUSM.L iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.99% | 32.23% | 4.76% | 1.17% | -18.34% | -1.05% | 19.02% | 14.88% | -10.27% | 34.67% |
EMHD.L Invesco FTSE Emerging Markets High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist | 6.65% | 26.92% | 2.28% | 10.90% | -17.26% | 13.67% | -6.85% | 15.06% | -6.42% | 25.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUSM.L and EMHD.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2016 | 0.77 |
The correlation between SUSM.L and EMHD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUSM.L vs. EMHD.L — Risk / Return Rank
SUSM.L
EMHD.L
SUSM.L vs. EMHD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUSM.L) and Invesco FTSE Emerging Markets High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (EMHD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUSM.L | EMHD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.31 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 3.69 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.91 | 10.19 | -1.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUSM.L | EMHD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 1.84 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.36 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.43 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
SUSM.L vs. EMHD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUSM.L drawdown since its inception was -40.77%, which is greater than EMHD.L's maximum drawdown of -38.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSM.L and EMHD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUSM.L | EMHD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.77% | -38.32% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.30% | -6.19% | -6.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.35% | -13.96% | -5.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.54% | -30.44% | -5.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.78% | -6.19% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.90% | -9.77% | -4.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 2.25% | +1.34% |
Volatility
SUSM.L vs. EMHD.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUSM.L) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to Invesco FTSE Emerging Markets High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (EMHD.L) at 3.97%. This indicates that SUSM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMHD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUSM.L | EMHD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.13% | 3.97% | +3.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.02% | 9.43% | +6.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.90% | 12.39% | +6.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 15.06% | +4.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 16.80% | +3.43% |
SUSM.L vs. EMHD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUSM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EMHD.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
SUSM.L vs. EMHD.L - Dividend Comparison
SUSM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMHD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMHD.L Invesco FTSE Emerging Markets High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist | 4.96% | 5.17% | 5.77% | 5.99% | 9.02% | 6.08% | 4.02% | 5.04% | 5.51% | 4.92% | 2.37% |
SUSM.L iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUSM.L and EMHD.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SUSM.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SUSM.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMHD.L.
SUSM.L tracks MSCI EM SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index, while EMHD.L tracks FTSE Emerging High Dividend Low Volatility Net Tax Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SUSM.L and 0.49% for EMHD.L.
Find the right allocation for SUSM.L and EMHD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer