PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUSL vs. EFIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUSL vs. EFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUSL achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly lower than EFIV's 9.91% return.


SUSL

1D
-0.94%
1M
4.53%
YTD
9.27%
6M
10.06%
1Y
27.64%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
13.77%
10Y*

EFIV

1D
-0.68%
1M
4.63%
YTD
9.91%
6M
10.51%
1Y
30.49%
3Y*
21.82%
5Y*
14.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUSL vs. EFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
9.27%18.97%23.51%29.08%-20.22%31.53%16.89%
EFIV
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF
9.91%18.47%23.80%27.92%-17.76%31.70%16.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSL and EFIV is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020

0.97

The correlation between SUSL and EFIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SUSL vs. EFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SUSL
EFIV

Technology

36.9%
36.9%

Communication Services

14.5%
12.8%

Financial Services

10.6%
12.5%

Healthcare

9.6%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
5.0%

Industrials

8.1%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
5.3%

Real Estate

2.2%
2.2%

Basic Materials

2.1%
2.0%

Energy

2.1%
2.9%

Utilities

1.1%
2.1%

Technology

SUSL
36.9%
EFIV
36.9%

Communication Services

SUSL
14.5%
EFIV
12.8%

Financial Services

SUSL
10.6%
EFIV
12.5%

Healthcare

SUSL
9.6%
EFIV
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SUSL
8.6%
EFIV
5.0%

Industrials

SUSL
8.1%
EFIV
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

SUSL
4.2%
EFIV
5.3%

Real Estate

SUSL
2.2%
EFIV
2.2%

Basic Materials

SUSL
2.1%
EFIV
2.0%

Energy

SUSL
2.1%
EFIV
2.9%

Utilities

SUSL
1.1%
EFIV
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUSL vs. EFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSL
SUSL Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SUSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSL Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSL Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

EFIV
EFIV Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUSL vs. EFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUSLEFIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.47

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

3.24

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.49

15.02

-4.52

SUSL vs. EFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSL Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the EFIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSL and EFIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUSLEFIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

2.60

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.86

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

1.06

-0.21

Drawdowns

SUSL vs. EFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSL drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, which is greater than EFIV's maximum drawdown of -24.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSL and EFIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUSLEFIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.26%

-24.52%

-9.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.37%

-9.44%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.91%

-19.23%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.98%

-24.52%

-2.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-1.02%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-4.81%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

2.04%

+0.60%

Volatility

SUSL vs. EFIV - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) at 3.14%. This indicates that SUSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUSLEFIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

3.14%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

9.00%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.98%

11.79%

+1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.48%

16.92%

+0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.80%

16.83%

+2.97%

SUSL vs. EFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SUSL and EFIV have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SUSL vs. EFIV - Dividend Comparison

SUSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than EFIV's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EFIV
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF
0.94%1.03%1.20%1.37%1.64%1.19%0.65%0.00%
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
0.93%0.99%1.10%1.27%1.57%1.12%1.38%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SUSL and EFIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SUSL has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to EFIV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSL dropped -34.26% vs EFIV's -24.52%.

On 5-year performance, EFIV leads with 14.48% vs 13.77% for SUSL. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, EFIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EFIV has performed better with a 14.48% return vs 13.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SUSL and EFIV have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

EFIV has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.93% for SUSL.

SUSL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while EFIV is S&P 500. SUSL tracks MSCI USA Extended ESG Leaders Index, while EFIV tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

EFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUSL and EFIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer