PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFIV vs. IYJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFIV vs. IYJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) and iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EFIV having a 10.48% return and IYJ slightly higher at 10.98%.


EFIV

1D
1.10%
1M
0.50%
6M
8.51%
YTD
10.48%
1Y
24.02%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
13.59%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.34%

IYJ

1D
0.42%
1M
-1.57%
6M
6.85%
YTD
10.98%
1Y
15.96%
3Y*
15.34%
5Y*
8.82%
10Y*
12.56%
ALL TIME*
8.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.53M$6.41M$3.64M
$17.87M$17.26M$14.22M

EFIV vs. IYJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EFIV
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF
10.48%18.47%23.80%27.92%-17.76%31.70%16.38%
IYJ
iShares U.S. Industrials ETF
10.98%11.94%17.82%19.94%-13.53%17.02%23.41%

Correlation

The correlation between EFIV and IYJ is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2020

0.82

The correlation between EFIV and IYJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFIV vs. IYJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EFIV
EFIV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
EFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

IYJ
IYJ Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IYJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IYJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EFIV vs. IYJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) and iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EFIVIYJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.16

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.24

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.30

4.54

+5.76

EFIV vs. IYJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the IYJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFIV and IYJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFIV vs. IYJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFIV drawdown since its inception was -24.52%, smaller than the maximum IYJ drawdown of -61.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFIV and IYJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFIVIYJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.52%

-61.97%

+37.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-11.39%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.23%

-19.67%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-26.24%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-2.14%

+1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-11.15%

+6.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

3.11%

-0.95%

Volatility

EFIV vs. IYJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) is 3.83%, while iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that EFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IYJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFIVIYJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

4.40%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

12.69%

-2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.96%

15.98%

-3.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.06%

18.17%

-1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.80%

19.88%

-3.08%

EFIV vs. IYJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFIV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IYJ's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFIV vs. IYJ - Dividend Comparison

EFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than IYJ's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFIV
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF
0.96%1.03%1.20%1.37%1.64%1.19%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IYJ
iShares U.S. Industrials ETF
0.72%0.83%0.88%1.05%1.05%0.76%1.01%1.32%1.43%1.29%1.38%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFIV and IYJ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYJ has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to EFIV (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFIV dropped -24.52% vs IYJ's -61.97%.

On 5-year performance, EFIV leads with 13.59% vs 8.82% for IYJ. On fees, EFIV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, EFIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EFIV has performed better with a 13.59% return vs 8.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFIV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYJ.

EFIV has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.72% for IYJ.

EFIV is categorized as S&P 500, while IYJ is Industrials Equities. EFIV tracks S&P 500 Scored & Screened Index, while IYJ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EFIV and 0.38% for IYJ.

EFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFIV and IYJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer