PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUSC vs. SUSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUSC vs. SUSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSC) and iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUSC achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than SUSL's 10.40% return.


SUSC

1D
0.03%
1M
1.23%
YTD
0.72%
6M
1.11%
1Y
5.58%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*

SUSL

1D
1.69%
1M
2.00%
YTD
10.40%
6M
11.04%
1Y
28.66%
3Y*
21.40%
5Y*
14.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUSC vs. SUSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SUSC
iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF
0.72%7.57%1.91%8.58%-15.95%-1.57%9.57%8.31%
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
10.40%18.97%23.51%29.08%-20.22%31.53%18.89%15.09%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSC and SUSL is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019

0.25

The correlation between SUSC and SUSL shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUSC vs. SUSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSC
SUSC Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SUSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSC Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSC Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

SUSL
SUSL Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SUSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSL Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSL Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUSC vs. SUSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSC) and iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SUSCSUSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.38

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

2.53

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.94

10.76

-4.82

SUSC vs. SUSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the SUSL Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSC and SUSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SUSC vs. SUSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSC drawdown since its inception was -22.42%, smaller than the maximum SUSL drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSC and SUSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUSCSUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.42%

-34.26%

+11.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-11.37%

+8.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.57%

-19.91%

+13.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.42%

-26.98%

+4.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-0.36%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.87%

-5.68%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

2.67%

-1.73%

Volatility

SUSC vs. SUSL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSC) is 1.46%, while iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL) has a volatility of 4.91%. This indicates that SUSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUSCSUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.46%

4.91%

-3.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.30%

10.72%

-7.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.36%

13.44%

-9.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.19%

17.56%

-10.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.62%

19.81%

-12.19%

SUSC vs. SUSL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SUSL's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SUSC vs. SUSL - Dividend Comparison

SUSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than SUSL's 1.13% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUSC
iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF
4.48%4.37%4.34%3.83%2.97%2.21%2.19%3.07%3.33%1.33%
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
1.13%0.99%1.10%1.27%1.57%1.12%1.38%1.12%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUSC and SUSL have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SUSL has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to SUSC (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSC dropped -22.42% vs SUSL's -34.26%.

On 5-year performance, SUSL leads with 14.02% vs 0.31% for SUSC. On fees, SUSL is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SUSC has been the lower-risk option at 1.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SUSL has performed better with a 14.02% return vs 0.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SUSL is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for SUSC.

SUSC has the higher dividend yield at 4.48%, compared with 1.13% for SUSL.

SUSC is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SUSL is Large Cap Growth Equities. SUSC tracks Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate ESG Focus Index, while SUSL tracks MSCI USA Extended ESG Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for SUSC and 0.10% for SUSL.

SUSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUSC and SUSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer