SUSC vs. ANGL
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSC) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL).
SUSC and ANGL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SUSC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate ESG Focus Index. It was launched on Jul 11, 2017. ANGL is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index. It was launched on Apr 10, 2012. Both SUSC and ANGL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SUSC or ANGL.
Correlation
The correlation between SUSC and ANGL is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SUSC vs. ANGL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SUSC:
0.36
ANGL:
1.05
SUSC:
0.54
ANGL:
1.50
SUSC:
1.06
ANGL:
1.19
SUSC:
0.16
ANGL:
1.01
SUSC:
1.17
ANGL:
6.48
SUSC:
1.82%
ANGL:
0.79%
SUSC:
5.91%
ANGL:
4.85%
SUSC:
-22.41%
ANGL:
-35.07%
SUSC:
-8.89%
ANGL:
-1.85%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUSC achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly lower than ANGL's 5.60% return.
SUSC
1.74%
-0.57%
1.61%
2.20%
0.02%
N/A
ANGL
5.60%
-0.47%
3.62%
5.28%
4.36%
6.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SUSC vs. ANGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUSC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ANGL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SUSC vs. ANGL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSC) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SUSC vs. ANGL - Dividend Comparison
SUSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, less than ANGL's 6.23% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUSC iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF | 4.35% | 3.83% | 2.97% | 2.21% | 2.20% | 3.08% | 3.88% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 6.23% | 5.27% | 4.72% | 3.90% | 4.67% | 5.20% | 6.00% | 5.25% | 5.79% | 5.82% | 6.80% | 6.10% |
Drawdowns
SUSC vs. ANGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUSC drawdown since its inception was -22.41%, smaller than the maximum ANGL drawdown of -35.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSC and ANGL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SUSC vs. ANGL - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSC) has a higher volatility of 1.97% compared to VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) at 1.82%. This indicates that SUSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.