PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUSB vs. USIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUSB vs. USIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) and iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SUSB having a 0.57% return and USIG slightly lower at 0.56%.


SUSB

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.92%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
5.45%
5Y*
2.20%
10Y*

USIG

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.37%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
0.72%
10Y*
2.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUSB vs. USIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUSB
iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF
0.57%6.81%4.83%5.98%-5.72%-0.76%4.96%7.02%0.54%0.28%
USIG
iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.56%7.86%2.56%8.71%-15.30%-1.34%9.44%13.99%-2.21%1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSB and USIG is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2017

0.72

The correlation between SUSB and USIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.86 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUSB vs. USIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSB
SUSB Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

USIG
USIG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
USIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
USIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
USIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
USIG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUSB vs. USIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) and iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUSBUSIGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.34

1.47

+0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.66

2.16

+1.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.26

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

2.17

+0.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.47

7.07

+5.40

SUSB vs. USIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSB Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the USIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSB and USIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUSBUSIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

1.47

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.11

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.54

+0.19

Drawdowns

SUSB vs. USIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSB drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, smaller than the maximum USIG drawdown of -22.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSB and USIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUSBUSIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-22.21%

+8.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.49%

-2.79%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.49%

-6.10%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.57%

-21.45%

+11.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.97%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.58%

-3.42%

+1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.86%

-0.50%

Volatility

SUSB vs. USIG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) is 0.64%, while iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that SUSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUSBUSIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

1.27%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.41%

3.04%

-1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93%

4.13%

-2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.96%

6.82%

-3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.72%

6.82%

-3.10%

SUSB vs. USIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSB has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than USIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SUSB vs. USIG - Dividend Comparison

SUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, less than USIG's 4.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SUSB
iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF
4.50%4.40%3.81%2.81%1.74%1.30%1.91%2.83%2.61%0.96%0.00%0.00%
USIG
iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.74%4.62%4.51%3.94%3.14%2.33%2.82%3.37%3.44%3.03%2.87%3.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUSB and USIG have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USIG has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to SUSB (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSB dropped -13.25% vs USIG's -22.21%.

On 5-year performance, SUSB leads with 2.20% vs 0.72% for USIG. On fees, USIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SUSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SUSB has performed better with a 2.20% return vs 0.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SUSB.

USIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 4.50% for SUSB.

SUSB tracks Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Corporate 1-5 Year ESG Focus Index, while USIG tracks ICE BofA US Corporate. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SUSB and 0.04% for USIG.

SUSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUSB and USIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer