PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USIG vs. DFAPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USIG vs. DFAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG) and DFA Investment Grade Portfolio (DFAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USIG achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than DFAPX's -0.17% return. Over the past 10 years, USIG has outperformed DFAPX with an annualized return of 2.31%, while DFAPX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.79% annualized return.


USIG

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.51%
6M
-0.85%
YTD
-0.49%
1Y
2.04%
3Y*
5.08%
5Y*
0.00%
10Y*
2.31%
ALL TIME*
3.85%

DFAPX

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.09%
6M
-0.36%
YTD
-0.17%
1Y
2.02%
3Y*
4.26%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
1.79%
ALL TIME*
2.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$98.77M$106.12M$96.97M

USIG vs. DFAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USIG
iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
-0.49%7.86%2.56%8.71%-15.30%-1.34%9.44%13.99%-2.21%5.75%
DFAPX
DFA Investment Grade Portfolio
-0.17%7.22%1.81%6.84%-12.92%-1.57%9.19%9.97%-0.24%3.37%

Correlation

The correlation between USIG and DFAPX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.85

The correlation between USIG and DFAPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USIG vs. DFAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USIG
USIG Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
USIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
USIG Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
USIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
USIG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAPX
DFAPX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
DFAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USIG vs. DFAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG) and DFA Investment Grade Portfolio (DFAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USIGDFAPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.13

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

1.07

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.91

2.63

+0.28

USIG vs. DFAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USIG Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is comparable to the DFAPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USIG and DFAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USIG vs. DFAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USIG drawdown since its inception was -22.21%, which is greater than DFAPX's maximum drawdown of -18.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USIG and DFAPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USIGDFAPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.21%

-18.30%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-2.66%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.97%

-4.69%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.45%

-18.22%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.45%

-18.30%

-3.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-2.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.40%

-3.45%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.08%

-0.11%

Volatility

USIG vs. DFAPX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG) and DFA Investment Grade Portfolio (DFAPX) have volatilities of 1.06% and 1.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USIGDFAPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

1.04%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.22%

2.92%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07%

3.82%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.81%

5.82%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.82%

4.89%

+1.93%

USIG vs. DFAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAPX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USIG vs. DFAPX - Dividend Comparison

USIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, more than DFAPX's 4.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAPX
DFA Investment Grade Portfolio
4.06%3.78%3.79%3.31%2.62%3.31%2.14%2.59%2.67%2.21%2.12%2.45%
USIG
iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.42%4.62%4.51%3.94%3.14%2.33%2.82%3.37%3.44%3.03%2.87%3.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, USIG and DFAPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

USIG has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to DFAPX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USIG dropped -22.21% vs DFAPX's -18.30%.

DFAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USIG and DFAPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer