SUSB vs. IBIT
SUSB (iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SUSB is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Corporate 1-5 Year ESG Focus Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SUSB returned 2.97% vs -44.50% for IBIT. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SUSB charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
SUSB vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUSB achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -28.22% return.
SUSB
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- 2.97%
- 3Y*
- 5.39%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.64%
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.89%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- 6M
- -24.95%
- YTD
- -28.22%
- 1Y
- -44.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.30B | $1.34B | $1.68B | |
| $4.18M | $4.00M | $9.18M |
SUSB vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SUSB iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF | 0.68% | 6.81% | 5.00% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -28.22% | -6.41% | 89.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUSB and IBIT is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUSB vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
SUSB
IBIT
SUSB vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SUSB | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.83 | +0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | -0.87 | +3.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.20 | -1.34 | +10.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SUSB vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUSB drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSB and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUSB | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.25% | -53.30% | +40.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.49% | -53.30% | +51.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -50.01% | +49.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -18.24% | +16.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.38% | 34.66% | -34.28% |
Volatility
SUSB vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) is 0.57%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.21%. This indicates that SUSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUSB | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.57% | 9.21% | -8.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.59% | 33.74% | -32.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98% | 44.46% | -42.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.98% | 49.60% | -46.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 49.60% | -45.90% |
SUSB vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUSB has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SUSB vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
SUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUSB iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF | 4.14% | 4.40% | 3.81% | 2.81% | 1.74% | 1.30% | 1.91% | 2.83% | 2.61% | 0.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUSB and IBIT have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to SUSB (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSB dropped -13.25% vs IBIT's -53.30%.
On 1-year performance, SUSB leads with 2.97% vs -44.50% for IBIT. On fees, SUSB is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SUSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SUSB has performed better with a 2.97% return vs -44.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SUSB is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.
SUSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.14%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
SUSB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. SUSB tracks Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Corporate 1-5 Year ESG Focus Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SUSB and 0.25% for IBIT.
SUSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SUSB and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer