PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUSA vs. GSEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUSA vs. GSEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUSA achieves a 11.51% return, which is significantly higher than GSEU's 6.97% return. Over the past 10 years, SUSA has outperformed GSEU with an annualized return of 15.03%, while GSEU has yielded a comparatively lower 9.25% annualized return.


SUSA

1D
0.36%
1M
5.24%
YTD
11.51%
6M
11.01%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*
15.03%

GSEU

1D
1.28%
1M
2.78%
YTD
6.97%
6M
10.59%
1Y
18.39%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
9.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUSA vs. GSEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUSA
iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF
11.51%15.72%22.43%23.88%-21.38%30.45%24.66%32.10%-5.67%22.52%
GSEU
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF
6.97%35.70%2.00%20.74%-17.90%17.33%6.64%24.57%-14.29%26.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSA and GSEU is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2016

0.72

The correlation between SUSA and GSEU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

SUSA vs. GSEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SUSA
GSEU

Technology

39.4%
8.1%

Financial Services

11.9%
24.7%

Industrials

10.2%
19.9%

Healthcare

9.0%
13.1%

Communication Services

8.5%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
6.6%

Energy

3.9%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
8.4%

Real Estate

3.1%
0.6%

Basic Materials

2.5%
5.0%

Utilities

1.3%
4.8%

Technology

SUSA
39.4%
GSEU
8.1%

Financial Services

SUSA
11.9%
GSEU
24.7%

Industrials

SUSA
10.2%
GSEU
19.9%

Healthcare

SUSA
9.0%
GSEU
13.1%

Communication Services

SUSA
8.5%
GSEU
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SUSA
6.9%
GSEU
6.6%

Energy

SUSA
3.9%
GSEU
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

SUSA
3.5%
GSEU
8.4%

Real Estate

SUSA
3.1%
GSEU
0.6%

Basic Materials

SUSA
2.5%
GSEU
5.0%

Utilities

SUSA
1.3%
GSEU
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUSA vs. GSEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSA
SUSA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

GSEU
GSEU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GSEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEU Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUSA vs. GSEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUSAGSEUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.22

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

1.55

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.27

5.83

+6.44

SUSA vs. GSEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSA Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the GSEU Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSA and GSEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUSAGSEUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

1.22

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.49

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.51

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.53

+0.05

Drawdowns

SUSA vs. GSEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSA drawdown since its inception was -53.93%, which is greater than GSEU's maximum drawdown of -35.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSA and GSEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUSAGSEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.93%

-35.71%

-18.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-11.90%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-14.12%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.23%

-33.98%

+5.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.93%

-35.71%

+2.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.90%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.24%

-6.60%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

3.16%

-0.97%

Volatility

SUSA vs. GSEU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) is 3.17%, while Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) has a volatility of 5.54%. This indicates that SUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUSAGSEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

5.54%

-2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

12.53%

-2.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.36%

15.14%

-2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

17.14%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.15%

18.11%

+0.04%

SUSA vs. GSEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SUSA and GSEU have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SUSA vs. GSEU - Dividend Comparison

SUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than GSEU's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSEU
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF
2.55%2.72%2.35%3.41%3.34%2.71%1.84%3.69%3.40%2.51%2.74%0.00%
SUSA
iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF
0.82%0.89%1.15%1.32%1.52%0.98%1.17%1.52%1.72%1.40%1.56%1.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUSA and GSEU have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSEU has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to SUSA (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSA dropped -53.93% vs GSEU's -35.71%.

On 10-year performance, SUSA leads with 15.03% vs 9.25% for GSEU. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, SUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SUSA has performed better with a 15.03% return vs 9.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SUSA and GSEU have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

GSEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 0.82% for SUSA.

SUSA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GSEU is Europe Equities. SUSA tracks MSCI USA ESG Select Index, while GSEU tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs.

SUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUSA and GSEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer