PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUSA vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUSA vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SUSA having a 11.51% return and BBUS slightly lower at 11.12%.


SUSA

1D
0.36%
1M
5.24%
YTD
11.51%
6M
11.01%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*
15.03%

BBUS

1D
0.47%
1M
4.82%
YTD
11.12%
6M
10.90%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.72%
5Y*
13.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUSA vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SUSA
iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF
11.51%15.72%22.43%23.88%-21.38%30.45%24.66%16.18%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
11.12%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.53%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSA and BBUS is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019

0.98

The correlation between SUSA and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

SUSA vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SUSA
BBUS

Technology

39.4%
37.1%

Financial Services

11.9%
10.8%

Industrials

10.2%
7.2%

Healthcare

9.0%
8.1%

Communication Services

8.5%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
9.4%

Energy

3.9%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
4.5%

Real Estate

3.1%
1.7%

Basic Materials

2.5%
1.2%

Utilities

1.3%
2.6%

Technology

SUSA
39.4%
BBUS
37.1%

Financial Services

SUSA
11.9%
BBUS
10.8%

Industrials

SUSA
10.2%
BBUS
7.2%

Healthcare

SUSA
9.0%
BBUS
8.1%

Communication Services

SUSA
8.5%
BBUS
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SUSA
6.9%
BBUS
9.4%

Energy

SUSA
3.9%
BBUS
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

SUSA
3.5%
BBUS
4.5%

Real Estate

SUSA
3.1%
BBUS
1.7%

Basic Materials

SUSA
2.5%
BBUS
1.2%

Utilities

SUSA
1.3%
BBUS
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUSA vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSA
SUSA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUSA vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUSABBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.43

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

3.06

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.27

14.04

-1.77

SUSA vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSA Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSA and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUSABBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

2.37

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.80

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.84

-0.26

Drawdowns

SUSA vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSA drawdown since its inception was -53.93%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSA and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUSABBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.93%

-35.35%

-18.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-9.21%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-19.01%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.23%

-25.46%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.28%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.24%

-5.45%

-1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.00%

+0.19%

Volatility

SUSA vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) has a higher volatility of 3.17% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.84%. This indicates that SUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUSABBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

2.84%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

8.97%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.36%

11.87%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

17.03%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.15%

19.59%

-1.44%

SUSA vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SUSA vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

SUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SUSA
iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF
0.82%0.89%1.15%1.32%1.52%0.98%1.17%1.52%1.72%1.40%1.56%1.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SUSA and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SUSA has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to BBUS (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSA dropped -53.93% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.53% vs 11.94% for SUSA. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 11.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SUSA.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.82% for SUSA.

SUSA tracks MSCI USA ESG Select Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SUSA and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUSA and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer