PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUPX vs. VRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SUPX vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Super X AI Technology Limited (SUPX) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUPX achieves a -58.61% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 49.17% return.


SUPX

1D
2.20%
1M
-18.98%
6M
-58.16%
YTD
-58.61%
1Y
-68.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.58%

VRT

1D
6.18%
1M
-19.62%
6M
29.81%
YTD
49.17%
1Y
70.80%
3Y*
109.07%
5Y*
53.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
49.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.30M$1.15M$2.15M
$1.93B$1.68B$1.97B

SUPX vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SUPX
Super X AI Technology Limited
-58.61%318.13%-6.25%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
49.17%42.80%38.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SUPX and VRT is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2024

0.06

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SUPX:

$204.53M

VRT:

$93.00B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUPX vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SUPX
SUPX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SUPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SUPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

VRT
VRT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SUPX vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Super X AI Technology Limited (SUPX) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SUPXVRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.22

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

1.63

-2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.99

5.58

-6.57

SUPX vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUPX Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUPX and VRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SUPX vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUPX drawdown since its inception was -92.25%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUPX and VRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUPXVRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.25%

-71.24%

-21.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-92.25%

-40.70%

-51.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.35%

-35.78%

-55.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.33%

-16.29%

-19.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

70.93%

12.00%

+58.93%

Volatility

SUPX vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

Super X AI Technology Limited (SUPX) has a higher volatility of 27.29% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 24.48%. This indicates that SUPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUPXVRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.29%

24.48%

+2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

90.05%

52.93%

+37.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

150.27%

64.52%

+85.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

121.93%

63.43%

+58.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

121.93%

55.31%

+66.62%

Dividends

SUPX vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

SUPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
SUPX
Super X AI Technology Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.09%0.11%0.10%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%

Financials

SUPX vs. VRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Super X AI Technology Limited and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SUPX and VRT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SUPX has higher volatility (27.29%) compared to VRT (24.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUPX dropped -92.25% vs VRT's -71.24%.

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUPX and VRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer