SUPX vs. CIEN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SUPX (Super X AI Technology Limited) and CIEN (Ciena Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — SUPX in Software - Infrastructure, CIEN in Communication Equipment. Over the past year, SUPX returned -16.14% vs 645.10% for CIEN. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SUPX vs. CIEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Super X AI Technology Limited (SUPX) and Ciena Corporation (CIEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUPX achieves a -37.69% return, which is significantly lower than CIEN's 165.26% return.

SUPX

• 1D: -10.78%
• 1M: 30.97%
• YTD: -37.69%
• 6M: -58.34%
• 1Y: -16.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIEN

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: 15.20%
• YTD: 165.26%
• 6M: 220.85%
• 1Y: 645.10%
• 3Y*: 134.47%
• 5Y*: 59.55%
• 10Y*: 40.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUPX vs. CIEN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SUPX Super X AI Technology Limited	-37.69%	318.13%	-7.64%
CIEN Ciena Corporation	165.26%	175.76%	89.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SUPX and CIEN is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2024	0.08

Return for Risk

SUPX vs. CIEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUPX

SUPX Risk / Return Rank: 44
SUPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
SUPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SUPX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SUPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
SUPX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

CIEN

CIEN Risk / Return Rank: 99
CIEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CIEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CIEN Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CIEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CIEN Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUPX vs. CIEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Super X AI Technology Limited (SUPX) and Ciena Corporation (CIEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SUPX	CIEN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.10	9.97	-10.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.06	5.64	-4.58
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.86	-0.73
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.18	38.67	-38.85
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.26	113.44	-113.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SUPX vs. CIEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUPX Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the CIEN Sharpe Ratio of 9.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUPX and CIEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SUPX	CIEN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10	9.97	-10.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.08	+0.33

Drawdowns

SUPX vs. CIEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUPX drawdown since its inception was -90.57%, smaller than the maximum CIEN drawdown of -99.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUPX and CIEN.

Drawdown Indicators

	SUPX	CIEN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.57%	-99.51%	+8.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-90.57%	-16.84%	-73.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-45.51%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-49.54%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-49.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-86.97%	-40.72%	-46.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.32%	-87.12%	+55.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	61.50%	5.73%	+55.77%

Volatility

SUPX vs. CIEN - Volatility Comparison

Super X AI Technology Limited (SUPX) has a higher volatility of 47.24% compared to Ciena Corporation (CIEN) at 19.50%. This indicates that SUPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SUPX	CIEN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	47.24%	19.50%	+27.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	96.05%	52.85%	+43.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	158.64%	65.31%	+93.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	123.85%	47.89%	+75.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	123.85%	43.99%	+79.86%

Dividends

SUPX vs. CIEN - Dividend Comparison

Neither SUPX nor CIEN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SUPX and CIEN in my portfolio?

SUPX and CIEN have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SUPX or CIEN?

SUPX has higher volatility (47.24%) compared to CIEN (19.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUPX dropped -90.57% vs CIEN's -99.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.97 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.