SUPV vs. PAM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SUPV (Grupo Supervielle S.A.) and PAM (Pampa Energía S.A.) are both stocks. SUPV operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while PAM operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, SUPV returned -1.04%/yr vs 13.40%/yr for PAM. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

SUPV vs. PAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) and Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUPV achieves a -19.46% return, which is significantly lower than PAM's -4.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SUPV has underperformed PAM with an annualized return of -1.04%, while PAM has yielded a comparatively higher 13.40% annualized return.

SUPV

• 1D: -5.46%
• 1M: 19.75%
• YTD: -19.46%
• 6M: -18.77%
• 1Y: -24.62%
• 3Y*: 63.78%
• 5Y*: 33.76%
• 10Y*: -1.04%

PAM

• 1D: -1.84%
• 1M: 4.65%
• YTD: -4.93%
• 6M: -8.80%
• 1Y: 9.76%
• 3Y*: 29.75%
• 5Y*: 37.79%
• 10Y*: 13.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUPV vs. PAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SUPV Grupo Supervielle S.A.	-19.46%	-20.75%	281.41%	87.96%	11.80%	-6.59%	-41.46%	-57.01%	-70.23%	124.27%
PAM Pampa Energía S.A.	-4.93%	0.65%	77.58%	55.04%	51.30%	53.19%	-16.13%	-48.35%	-52.72%	93.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SUPV and PAM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2016	0.62

The correlation between SUPV and PAM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap SUPV : $752.19M PAM : $4.58B
EPS SUPV : -$72.13 PAM : $8.05
PS Ratio SUPV : 0.00 PAM : 2.12
PB Ratio SUPV : 0.00 PAM : 1.21
Total Revenue (TTM) SUPV : $1.02T PAM : $2.16B
Gross Profit (TTM) SUPV : $425.09B PAM : $682.00M
EBITDA (TTM) SUPV : -$9.21B PAM : $1.22B

Return for Risk

SUPV vs. PAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUPV

SUPV Risk / Return Rank: 30
SUPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
SUPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SUPV Omega Ratio Rank: 35
SUPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
SUPV Martin Ratio Rank: 24

PAM

PAM Risk / Return Rank: 47
PAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
PAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
PAM Omega Ratio Rank: 45
PAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
PAM Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUPV vs. PAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) and Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SUPV	PAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.26	0.19	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.26	0.69	-0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.09	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.40	0.31	-0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.85	0.76	-1.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SUPV vs. PAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUPV Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the PAM Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUPV and PAM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SUPV	PAM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26	0.19	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.82	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.01	0.26	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.01	0.25	-0.26

Drawdowns

SUPV vs. PAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUPV drawdown since its inception was -95.98%, which is greater than PAM's maximum drawdown of -87.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUPV and PAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SUPV	PAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.98%	-87.41%	-8.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.45%	-31.59%	-30.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-75.20%	-40.40%	-34.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.20%	-40.40%	-34.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.98%	-87.41%	-8.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-68.20%	-11.31%	-56.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.99%	-42.45%	-24.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.36%	12.83%	+16.53%

Volatility

SUPV vs. PAM - Volatility Comparison

Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) has a higher volatility of 23.34% compared to Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM) at 12.72%. This indicates that SUPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SUPV	PAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.34%	12.72%	+10.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.12%	23.96%	+22.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	95.28%	51.51%	+43.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.33%	46.27%	+25.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.27%	51.95%	+20.32%

Dividends

SUPV vs. PAM - Dividend Comparison

Neither SUPV nor PAM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PAM Pampa Energía S.A.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SUPV Grupo Supervielle S.A.	0.00%	1.71%	1.12%	0.00%	0.71%	1.36%	1.79%	2.03%	1.32%	0.30%

Financials

SUPV vs. PAM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Grupo Supervielle S.A. and Pampa Energía S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SUPV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported a gross profit of 169.00M and revenue of 387.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.6%.

PAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pampa Energía S.A. reported a gross profit of 193.00M and revenue of 573.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.7%.

SUPV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported an operating income of -15.76M and revenue of 387.59M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.1%.

PAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pampa Energía S.A. reported an operating income of 107.00M and revenue of 573.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.

SUPV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported a net income of -12.03M and revenue of 387.59M, resulting in a net margin of -3.1%.

PAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pampa Energía S.A. reported a net income of 214.00M and revenue of 573.00M, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SUPV and PAM in my portfolio?

SUPV and PAM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SUPV or PAM?

SUPV has higher volatility (23.34%) compared to PAM (12.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUPV dropped -95.98% vs PAM's -87.41%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.