SUPV vs. PAM
SUPV (Grupo Supervielle S.A.) and PAM (Pampa Energía S.A.) are both stocks. SUPV operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while PAM operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, SUPV returned -2.32%/yr vs 12.30%/yr for PAM. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
SUPV vs. PAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUPV achieves a -19.97% return, which is significantly lower than PAM's -0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, SUPV has underperformed PAM with an annualized return of -2.32%, while PAM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.30% annualized return.
SUPV
- 1D
- -5.87%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- 6M
- -22.52%
- YTD
- -19.97%
- 1Y
- -4.92%
- 3Y*
- 47.19%
- 5Y*
- 38.43%
- 10Y*
- -2.32%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.90%
PAM
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 9.61%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 1Y
- 19.01%
- 3Y*
- 27.24%
- 5Y*
- 41.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.15%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $15.34M | $12.23M | $17.41M | |
| $3.94M | $4.00M | $6.70M |
SUPV vs. PAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUPV Grupo Supervielle S.A. | -19.97% | -20.75% | 281.41% | 87.96% | 11.80% | -6.59% | -41.46% | -57.01% | -70.23% | 124.27% |
PAM Pampa Energía S.A. | -0.21% | 0.65% | 77.58% | 55.04% | 51.30% | 53.19% | -16.13% | -48.35% | -52.72% | 93.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUPV and PAM is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2016 | 0.62 |
The correlation between SUPV and PAM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
SUPV:
$828.19M
PAM:
$4.80B
SUPV:
-ARS 72.73
PAM:
$8.05
SUPV:
1.16
PAM:
2.23
SUPV:
1.02
PAM:
1.27
SUPV:
ARS 1.02T
PAM:
$2.16B
SUPV:
ARS 425.09B
PAM:
$682.00M
SUPV:
-ARS 9.21B
PAM:
$1.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUPV vs. PAM — Risk / Return Rank
SUPV
PAM
SUPV vs. PAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) and Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SUPV | PAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.11 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 0.51 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.30 | 1.23 | -1.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SUPV vs. PAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUPV drawdown since its inception was -95.98%, which is greater than PAM's maximum drawdown of -87.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUPV and PAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUPV | PAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.98% | -87.41% | -8.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.91% | -31.59% | -28.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.20% | -40.40% | -34.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.20% | -40.40% | -34.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.98% | -87.41% | -8.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.40% | -6.91% | -61.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.96% | -42.23% | -24.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.76% | 13.10% | +15.66% |
Volatility
SUPV vs. PAM - Volatility Comparison
Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) has a higher volatility of 19.71% compared to Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM) at 8.56%. This indicates that SUPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUPV | PAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.71% | 8.56% | +11.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.04% | 24.74% | +24.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 96.31% | 49.75% | +46.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.87% | 46.15% | +25.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.71% | 51.97% | +20.74% |
Dividends
SUPV vs. PAM - Dividend Comparison
Neither SUPV nor PAM has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAM Pampa Energía S.A. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUPV Grupo Supervielle S.A. | 0.00% | 1.71% | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.71% | 1.36% | 1.79% | 2.03% | 1.32% | 0.30% |
Financials
SUPV vs. PAM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grupo Supervielle S.A. and Pampa Energía S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SUPV vs. PAM - Profitability Comparison
SUPV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported a gross profit of 169.00M and revenue of 387.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.6%.
PAM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pampa Energía S.A. reported a gross profit of 193.00M and revenue of 573.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.7%.
SUPV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported an operating income of -15.76M and revenue of 387.59M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.1%.
PAM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pampa Energía S.A. reported an operating income of 107.00M and revenue of 573.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.
SUPV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported a net income of -12.03M and revenue of 387.59M, resulting in a net margin of -3.1%.
PAM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pampa Energía S.A. reported a net income of 214.00M and revenue of 573.00M, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SUPV and PAM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SUPV has higher volatility (19.71%) compared to PAM (8.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUPV dropped -95.98% vs PAM's -87.41%.
PAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SUPV and PAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer