SUPV vs. BMA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) and Banco Macro S.A. (BMA).

Performance

SUPV vs. BMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) and Banco Macro S.A. (BMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SUPV vs. BMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SUPV Grupo Supervielle S.A.	-20.22%	-20.75%	281.41%	87.96%	11.80%	-6.59%	-41.46%	-57.01%	-70.23%	124.27%
BMA Banco Macro S.A.	-12.98%	-3.55%	277.79%	91.62%	27.04%	-9.96%	-57.05%	-14.00%	-60.72%	81.54%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SUPV : $825.50M BMA : $4.95T
EPS SUPV : -$553.41 BMA : $10.77
PS Ratio SUPV : 0.00 BMA : 0.34
PB Ratio SUPV : 0.00 BMA : 1.37
Total Revenue (TTM) SUPV : $1.49T BMA : $4.81T
Gross Profit (TTM) SUPV : $696.67B BMA : $3.27T
EBITDA (TTM) SUPV : -$73.43B BMA : $407.74B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUPV achieves a -20.22% return, which is significantly lower than BMA's -12.98% return.

SUPV

• 1D: 12.00%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: -20.22%
• 6M: 90.51%
• 1Y: -26.85%
• 3Y*: 63.26%
• 5Y*: 41.97%
• 10Y*: —

BMA

• 1D: 10.45%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: -12.98%
• 6M: 88.14%
• 1Y: 7.55%
• 3Y*: 77.60%
• 5Y*: 52.36%
• 10Y*: 6.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SUPV vs. BMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUPV

SUPV Risk / Return Rank: 31
SUPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
SUPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SUPV Omega Ratio Rank: 35
SUPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
SUPV Martin Ratio Rank: 29

BMA

BMA Risk / Return Rank: 46
BMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
BMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
BMA Omega Ratio Rank: 49
BMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
BMA Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUPV vs. BMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) and Banco Macro S.A. (BMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SUPV	BMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.28	0.10	-0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.23	0.80	-0.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.10	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.42	0.06	-0.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.77	0.14	-0.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SUPV vs. BMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUPV Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the BMA Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUPV and BMA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SUPV	BMA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.28	0.10	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.89	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.01	0.18	-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between SUPV and BMA is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SUPV vs. BMA - Dividend Comparison

SUPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than BMA's 4.24% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
SUPV Grupo Supervielle S.A.	2.14%	1.71%	1.12%	0.00%	0.71%	1.36%	1.79%	2.03%	1.32%	0.30%	0.00%
BMA Banco Macro S.A.	4.24%	2.38%	6.10%	7.75%	7.28%	0.00%	0.00%	6.20%	5.05%	0.65%	1.53%

Drawdowns

SUPV vs. BMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUPV drawdown since its inception was -95.98%, roughly equal to the maximum BMA drawdown of -91.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUPV and BMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SUPV	BMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.98%	-91.66%	-4.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-71.51%	-58.48%	-13.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.20%	-65.40%	-9.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-91.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-68.50%	-29.90%	-38.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.93%	-44.99%	-21.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.12%	26.44%	+12.68%

Volatility

SUPV vs. BMA - Volatility Comparison

Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) has a higher volatility of 22.17% compared to Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) at 16.97%. This indicates that SUPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SUPV	BMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.17%	16.97%	+5.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	69.42%	51.53%	+17.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	97.53%	76.34%	+21.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.73%	59.30%	+11.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.28%	62.19%	+10.09%

Financials

SUPV vs. BMA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Grupo Supervielle S.A. and Banco Macro S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SUPV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported a gross profit of 201.67B and revenue of 584.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.5%.

BMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported a gross profit of 802.92B and revenue of 802.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

SUPV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported an operating income of -37.51B and revenue of 584.35B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.4%.

BMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported an operating income of 488.39B and revenue of 802.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.8%.

SUPV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported a net income of -19.71B and revenue of 584.35B, resulting in a net margin of -3.4%.

BMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported a net income of 69.19B and revenue of 802.92B, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.