PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUPV vs. FINV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SUPV vs. FINV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) and FinVolution Group (FINV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUPV achieves a -6.94% return, which is significantly lower than FINV's 2.28% return.


SUPV

1D
1.01%
1M
39.42%
YTD
-6.94%
6M
-0.36%
1Y
-3.17%
3Y*
63.15%
5Y*
38.77%
10Y*
0.23%

FINV

1D
1.62%
1M
1.82%
YTD
2.28%
6M
1.69%
1Y
-38.52%
3Y*
8.84%
5Y*
-4.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUPV vs. FINV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUPV
Grupo Supervielle S.A.
-6.94%-20.75%281.41%87.96%11.80%-6.59%-41.46%-57.01%-70.23%14.22%
FINV
FinVolution Group
2.28%-20.07%45.47%4.39%6.39%89.23%8.51%-22.85%-49.37%-46.54%

Correlation

The correlation between SUPV and FINV is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SUPV:

$869.13M

FINV:

$1.29B

EPS

SUPV:

-ARS 72.13

FINV:

CN¥8.34

PS Ratio

SUPV:

1.31

FINV:

0.68

PB Ratio

SUPV:

1.14

FINV:

0.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

SUPV:

ARS 1.02T

FINV:

CN¥13.24B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SUPV:

ARS 425.09B

FINV:

CN¥10.21B

EBITDA (TTM)

SUPV:

-ARS 9.21B

FINV:

CN¥2.61B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUPV vs. FINV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUPV
SUPV Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SUPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUPV Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SUPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUPV Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

FINV
FINV Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FINV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FINV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FINV Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FINV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FINV Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUPV vs. FINV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) and FinVolution Group (FINV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SUPVFINVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.87

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

-0.71

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.32

-0.96

+0.64

SUPV vs. FINV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUPV Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is higher than the FINV Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUPV and FINV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SUPV vs. FINV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUPV drawdown since its inception was -95.98%, which is greater than FINV's maximum drawdown of -89.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUPV and FINV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUPVFINVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.98%

-89.76%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.91%

-56.42%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.20%

-56.42%

-18.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.20%

-70.54%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.26%

-49.54%

-13.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.96%

-54.09%

-12.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.53%

41.69%

-13.16%

Volatility

SUPV vs. FINV - Volatility Comparison

Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) has a higher volatility of 23.01% compared to FinVolution Group (FINV) at 19.10%. This indicates that SUPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FINV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUPVFINVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.01%

19.10%

+3.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.05%

33.29%

+13.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.72%

48.91%

+46.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.42%

49.99%

+21.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.39%

71.75%

+0.64%

Dividends

SUPV vs. FINV - Dividend Comparison

SUPV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FINV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FINV
FinVolution Group
6.08%5.30%3.49%4.39%4.13%3.45%4.49%7.17%0.00%0.00%
SUPV
Grupo Supervielle S.A.
0.00%1.71%1.12%0.00%0.71%1.36%1.79%2.03%1.32%0.30%

Financials

SUPV vs. FINV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grupo Supervielle S.A. and FinVolution Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B1.00T20222023202420252026
387.59M
3.19B
(SUPV) Total Revenue
(FINV) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. SUPV values in ARS, FINV values in CNY

SUPV vs. FINV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Grupo Supervielle S.A. and FinVolution Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
43.6%
76.3%
Portfolio components
SUPV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported a gross profit of 169.00M and revenue of 387.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.6%.

FINV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FinVolution Group reported a gross profit of 2.43B and revenue of 3.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.3%.

SUPV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported an operating income of -15.76M and revenue of 387.59M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.1%.

FINV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FinVolution Group reported an operating income of 526.49M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.

SUPV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported a net income of -12.03M and revenue of 387.59M, resulting in a net margin of -3.1%.

FINV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FinVolution Group reported a net income of 412.55M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SUPV and FINV have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SUPV has higher volatility (23.01%) compared to FINV (19.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUPV dropped -95.98% vs FINV's -89.76%.

SUPV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.09 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUPV and FINV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer