PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUPV vs. CTLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SUPV vs. CTLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) and Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SUPV

1D
-3.44%
1M
-13.36%
6M
-18.27%
YTD
-19.37%
1Y
-3.35%
3Y*
49.19%
5Y*
38.21%
10Y*
-2.16%

CTLP

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUPV vs. CTLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUPV
Grupo Supervielle S.A.
-19.37%-20.75%281.41%87.96%11.80%-6.59%-41.46%-57.01%-70.23%124.27%
CTLP
Cantaloupe, Inc.
5.46%11.67%28.34%70.34%-51.01%-15.27%41.62%90.23%-60.10%126.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SUPV and CTLP is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2016

0.15

The correlation between SUPV and CTLP shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SUPV:

$834.32M

CTLP:

$825.82M

EPS

SUPV:

-ARS 72.73

CTLP:

$0.07

PS Ratio

SUPV:

1.17

CTLP:

1.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

SUPV:

ARS 1.02T

CTLP:

$320.82M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SUPV:

ARS 425.09B

CTLP:

$92.41M

EBITDA (TTM)

SUPV:

-ARS 9.21B

CTLP:

$24.24M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUPV vs. CTLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUPV
SUPV Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SUPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUPV Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SUPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUPV Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

CTLP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUPV vs. CTLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) and Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SUPVCTLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.12

SUPV vs. CTLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SUPV vs. CTLP - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUPVCTLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.20%

Volatility

SUPV vs. CTLP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUPVCTLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

96.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.58%

Dividends

SUPV vs. CTLP - Dividend Comparison

Neither SUPV nor CTLP has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CTLP
Cantaloupe, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SUPV
Grupo Supervielle S.A.
0.00%1.71%1.12%0.00%0.71%1.36%1.79%2.03%1.32%0.30%

Financials

SUPV vs. CTLP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grupo Supervielle S.A. and Cantaloupe, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B1.00TJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
387.59M
78.69M
(SUPV) Total Revenue
(CTLP) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. SUPV values in ARS, CTLP values in USD

SUPV vs. CTLP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Grupo Supervielle S.A. and Cantaloupe, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
43.6%
0
Portfolio components
SUPV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported a gross profit of 169.00M and revenue of 387.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.6%.

CTLP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cantaloupe, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 78.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SUPV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported an operating income of -15.76M and revenue of 387.59M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.1%.

CTLP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cantaloupe, Inc. reported an operating income of -767.00K and revenue of 78.69M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.0%.

SUPV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported a net income of -12.03M and revenue of 387.59M, resulting in a net margin of -3.1%.

CTLP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cantaloupe, Inc. reported a net income of -2.16M and revenue of 78.69M, resulting in a net margin of -2.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SUPV and CTLP have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUPV and CTLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer