CTLP vs. IRM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CTLP (Cantaloupe, Inc.) and IRM (Iron Mountain Incorporated) are both stocks. CTLP operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while IRM operates in REIT - Specialty (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, CTLP returned 9.60%/yr vs 19.57%/yr for IRM. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CTLP vs. IRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTLP achieves a 5.46% return, which is significantly lower than IRM's 55.51% return. Over the past 10 years, CTLP has underperformed IRM with an annualized return of 9.60%, while IRM has yielded a comparatively higher 19.57% annualized return.

CTLP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 5.46%
• 6M: 5.86%
• 1Y: 28.00%
• 3Y*: 18.56%
• 5Y*: 0.22%
• 10Y*: 9.60%

IRM

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -0.21%
• YTD: 55.51%
• 6M: 54.66%
• 1Y: 32.49%
• 3Y*: 36.93%
• 5Y*: 27.93%
• 10Y*: 19.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTLP vs. IRM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CTLP Cantaloupe, Inc.	5.46%	11.67%	28.34%	70.34%	-51.01%	-15.27%	41.62%	90.23%	-60.10%	126.74%
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated	55.51%	-18.24%	54.48%	46.52%	-0.08%	87.74%	0.98%	5.87%	-7.97%	23.56%

Correlation

The correlation between CTLP and IRM is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 1999	0.12

The correlation between CTLP and IRM shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.26 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS CTLP : $0.07 IRM : $0.91
PE Ratio CTLP : 167.76 IRM : 139.85
PS Ratio CTLP : 1.93 IRM : 5.26
Total Revenue (TTM) CTLP : $320.82M IRM : $7.25B
Gross Profit (TTM) CTLP : $92.41M IRM : $2.94B
EBITDA (TTM) CTLP : $24.24M IRM : $2.40B

Return for Risk

CTLP vs. IRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTLP

CTLP Risk / Return Rank: 85
CTLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
CTLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CTLP Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CTLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
CTLP Martin Ratio Rank: 86

IRM

IRM Risk / Return Rank: 67
IRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
IRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
IRM Omega Ratio Rank: 65
IRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
IRM Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTLP vs. IRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CTLP	IRM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.04	+0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	1.59	+1.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.20	+0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.47	1.30	+2.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.31	3.12	+6.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CTLP vs. IRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTLP Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the IRM Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTLP and IRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CTLP	IRM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	1.04	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.00	0.95	-0.94
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	0.66	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.22	0.50	-0.72

Drawdowns

CTLP vs. IRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTLP drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than IRM's maximum drawdown of -55.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTLP and IRM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTLP	IRM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.98%	-55.71%	-44.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.26%	-25.15%	+14.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.07%	-39.03%	+3.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-77.69%	-39.03%	-38.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-82.71%	-39.03%	-43.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.55%	-3.11%	-96.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-99.10%	-13.17%	-85.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.88%	10.43%	-6.55%

Volatility

CTLP vs. IRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) is 2.20%, while Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) has a volatility of 7.78%. This indicates that CTLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTLP	IRM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.20%	7.78%	-5.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.90%	23.40%	-15.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.88%	31.50%	-6.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.27%	29.59%	+15.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.47%	29.59%	+28.88%

Dividends

CTLP vs. IRM - Dividend Comparison

CTLP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CTLP Cantaloupe, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated	2.58%	3.88%	2.60%	3.63%	4.96%	4.73%	8.39%	7.69%	7.32%	5.93%	6.17%	7.07%

Financials

CTLP vs. IRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cantaloupe, Inc. and Iron Mountain Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CTLP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cantaloupe, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 78.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

IRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CTLP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cantaloupe, Inc. reported an operating income of -767.00K and revenue of 78.69M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.0%.

IRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported an operating income of 395.23M and revenue of 1.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

CTLP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cantaloupe, Inc. reported a net income of -2.16M and revenue of 78.69M, resulting in a net margin of -2.7%.

IRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported a net income of 143.67M and revenue of 1.94B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTLP and IRM in my portfolio?

CTLP and IRM have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CTLP or IRM?

IRM has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to CTLP (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTLP dropped -99.98% vs IRM's -55.71%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CTLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.