CTLP vs. IRM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CTLP (Cantaloupe, Inc.) and IRM (Iron Mountain Incorporated) are both stocks. CTLP operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while IRM operates in REIT - Specialty (Real Estate). At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CTLP vs. IRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CTLP

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IRM

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 5.94%
• YTD: 62.82%
• 6M: 67.16%
• 1Y: 33.52%
• 3Y*: 39.60%
• 5Y*: 30.12%
• 10Y*: 19.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTLP vs. IRM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CTLP Cantaloupe, Inc.	5.46%	11.67%	28.34%	70.34%	-51.01%	-15.27%	41.62%	90.23%	-60.10%	126.74%
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated	62.82%	-18.24%	54.48%	46.52%	-0.08%	87.74%	0.98%	5.87%	-7.97%	23.56%

Correlation

The correlation between CTLP and IRM is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 1999	0.12

The correlation between CTLP and IRM shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.26 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS CTLP : $0.07 IRM : $0.91
PE Ratio CTLP : 167.76 IRM : 145.44
PS Ratio CTLP : 1.93 IRM : 5.47
Total Revenue (TTM) CTLP : $320.82M IRM : $7.25B
Gross Profit (TTM) CTLP : $92.41M IRM : $2.94B
EBITDA (TTM) CTLP : $24.24M IRM : $2.40B

Return for Risk

CTLP vs. IRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTLP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IRM

IRM Risk / Return Rank: 69
IRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
IRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
IRM Omega Ratio Rank: 67
IRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
IRM Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTLP vs. IRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CTLP	IRM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.05	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.59	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.20	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.34	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.21	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CTLP	IRM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-55.71%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-25.15%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-39.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-39.03%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-13.15%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.48%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CTLP	IRM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.43%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	23.41%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	32.25%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	29.67%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	29.68%	—

Dividends

CTLP vs. IRM - Dividend Comparison

CTLP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CTLP Cantaloupe, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated	2.54%	3.88%	2.60%	3.63%	4.96%	4.73%	8.39%	7.69%	7.32%	5.93%	6.17%	7.07%

Financials

CTLP vs. IRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cantaloupe, Inc. and Iron Mountain Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CTLP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cantaloupe, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 78.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

IRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CTLP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cantaloupe, Inc. reported an operating income of -767.00K and revenue of 78.69M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.0%.

IRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported an operating income of 395.23M and revenue of 1.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

CTLP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cantaloupe, Inc. reported a net income of -2.16M and revenue of 78.69M, resulting in a net margin of -2.7%.

IRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported a net income of 143.67M and revenue of 1.94B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTLP and IRM in my portfolio?

CTLP and IRM have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.