CTLP vs. IRM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM).

Performance

CTLP vs. IRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CTLP vs. IRM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CTLP Cantaloupe, Inc.	1.79%	11.67%	28.34%	70.34%	-51.01%	-15.27%	41.62%	90.23%	-60.10%	126.74%
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated	24.14%	-18.24%	54.48%	46.52%	-0.08%	87.74%	0.98%	5.87%	-7.97%	23.56%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CTLP : $798.87M IRM : $30.48B
EPS CTLP : $0.75 IRM : $0.49
PE Ratio CTLP : 14.46 IRM : 209.97
PS Ratio CTLP : 2.50 IRM : 4.40
Total Revenue (TTM) CTLP : $317.56M IRM : $6.90B
Gross Profit (TTM) CTLP : $123.77M IRM : $3.82B
EBITDA (TTM) CTLP : $37.91M IRM : $2.20B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTLP achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly lower than IRM's 24.14% return. Over the past 10 years, CTLP has underperformed IRM with an annualized return of 9.21%, while IRM has yielded a comparatively higher 18.42% annualized return.

CTLP

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 3.54%
• YTD: 1.79%
• 6M: 2.27%
• 1Y: 37.36%
• 3Y*: 23.78%
• 5Y*: -2.10%
• 10Y*: 9.21%

IRM

• 1D: 4.65%
• 1M: -4.95%
• YTD: 24.14%
• 6M: 2.07%
• 1Y: 22.87%
• 3Y*: 28.85%
• 5Y*: 27.35%
• 10Y*: 18.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CTLP vs. IRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTLP

CTLP Risk / Return Rank: 87
CTLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
CTLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CTLP Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CTLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
CTLP Martin Ratio Rank: 90

IRM

IRM Risk / Return Rank: 63
IRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
IRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
IRM Omega Ratio Rank: 60
IRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
IRM Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTLP vs. IRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CTLP	IRM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	0.70	+0.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	1.15	+1.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.15	+0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.17	0.96	+3.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.51	2.32	+8.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CTLP vs. IRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTLP Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the IRM Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTLP and IRM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CTLP	IRM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	0.70	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.05	0.94	-0.98
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	0.63	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.22	0.48	-0.70

Correlation

The correlation between CTLP and IRM is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CTLP vs. IRM - Dividend Comparison

CTLP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CTLP Cantaloupe, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated	3.23%	3.88%	2.60%	3.63%	4.96%	4.73%	8.39%	7.69%	7.32%	5.93%	6.17%	7.07%

Drawdowns

CTLP vs. IRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTLP drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than IRM's maximum drawdown of -55.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTLP and IRM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTLP	IRM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.98%	-55.71%	-44.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.26%	-25.15%	+14.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-77.74%	-39.03%	-38.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-82.71%	-39.03%	-43.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.57%	-16.21%	-83.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-99.10%	-13.21%	-85.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.07%	10.47%	-6.40%

Volatility

CTLP vs. IRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) is 4.29%, while Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) has a volatility of 9.03%. This indicates that CTLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTLP	IRM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.29%	9.03%	-4.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.58%	23.37%	-15.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.93%	32.70%	-3.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.97%	29.32%	+16.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.66%	29.31%	+29.35%

Financials

CTLP vs. IRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cantaloupe, Inc. and Iron Mountain Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CTLP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cantaloupe, Inc. reported a gross profit of 26.00M and revenue of 78.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.0%.

IRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported a gross profit of 1.02B and revenue of 1.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.

CTLP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cantaloupe, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.46M and revenue of 78.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.9%.

IRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported an operating income of 341.04M and revenue of 1.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.5%.

CTLP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cantaloupe, Inc. reported a net income of -70.00K and revenue of 78.71M, resulting in a net margin of -0.1%.

IRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported a net income of 89.27M and revenue of 1.84B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.