PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTLP vs. DRD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CTLP vs. DRD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) and DRDGOLD Limited (DRD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTLP achieves a 5.46% return, which is significantly higher than DRD's -17.62% return. Over the past 10 years, CTLP has underperformed DRD with an annualized return of 9.60%, while DRD has yielded a comparatively higher 21.51% annualized return.


CTLP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.09%
YTD
5.46%
6M
5.86%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
0.22%
10Y*
9.60%

DRD

1D
-2.24%
1M
-5.31%
YTD
-17.62%
6M
-10.56%
1Y
60.96%
3Y*
33.19%
5Y*
18.62%
10Y*
21.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTLP vs. DRD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CTLP
Cantaloupe, Inc.
5.46%11.67%28.34%70.34%-51.01%-15.27%41.62%90.23%-60.10%126.74%
DRD
DRDGOLD Limited
-17.62%267.16%11.55%13.26%-7.63%-23.16%141.46%153.56%-35.27%-37.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CTLP and DRD is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 1999

0.04

Fundamentals

EPS

CTLP:

$0.07

DRD:

$100.99

PE Ratio

CTLP:

167.76

DRD:

0.25

PEG Ratio

CTLP:

0.00

DRD:

0.02

PS Ratio

CTLP:

1.93

DRD:

0.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

CTLP:

$320.82M

DRD:

$15.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CTLP:

$92.41M

DRD:

$6.44B

EBITDA (TTM)

CTLP:

$24.24M

DRD:

$7.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTLP vs. DRD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTLP
CTLP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CTLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTLP Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CTLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTLP Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

DRD
DRD Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRD Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRD Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTLP vs. DRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) and DRDGOLD Limited (DRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTLPDRDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

1.05

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.63

1.58

+1.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.20

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

1.76

+1.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.31

3.89

+5.42

CTLP vs. DRD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTLP Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the DRD Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTLP and DRD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTLPDRDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.05

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.36

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.37

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.22

-0.02

-0.20

Drawdowns

CTLP vs. DRD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTLP drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, roughly equal to the maximum DRD drawdown of -98.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTLP and DRD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTLPDRDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-98.44%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.26%

-34.80%

+24.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.07%

-45.13%

+10.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.69%

-60.31%

-17.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.71%

-80.31%

-2.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.55%

-44.47%

-55.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-99.10%

-81.90%

-17.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

15.98%

-12.10%

Volatility

CTLP vs. DRD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) is 2.20%, while DRDGOLD Limited (DRD) has a volatility of 18.51%. This indicates that CTLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTLPDRDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

18.51%

-16.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.90%

42.70%

-34.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.88%

58.34%

-33.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.27%

51.37%

-6.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.47%

57.98%

+0.49%

Dividends

CTLP vs. DRD - Dividend Comparison

CTLP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTLP
Cantaloupe, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DRD
DRDGOLD Limited
2.13%1.26%2.53%5.74%5.00%6.54%4.47%2.65%2.05%1.12%6.15%3.73%

Financials

CTLP vs. DRD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cantaloupe, Inc. and DRDGOLD Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
78.69M
4.81B
(CTLP) Total Revenue
(DRD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CTLP vs. DRD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cantaloupe, Inc. and DRDGOLD Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%202220232024202520260
48.2%
Portfolio components
CTLP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cantaloupe, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 78.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

DRD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DRDGOLD Limited reported a gross profit of 2.32B and revenue of 4.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.2%.

CTLP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cantaloupe, Inc. reported an operating income of -767.00K and revenue of 78.69M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.0%.

DRD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DRDGOLD Limited reported an operating income of 2.20B and revenue of 4.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.8%.

CTLP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cantaloupe, Inc. reported a net income of -2.16M and revenue of 78.69M, resulting in a net margin of -2.7%.

DRD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DRDGOLD Limited reported a net income of 1.84B and revenue of 4.81B, resulting in a net margin of 38.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CTLP and DRD have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRD has higher volatility (18.51%) compared to CTLP (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTLP dropped -99.98% vs DRD's -98.44%.

CTLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTLP and DRD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer